Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Seth Purty and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Decided On : Sep-11-2015
Court : Jharkhand
LAW: Section 62, Section 24 and Section 62, Section 24, the Standards Act, the Standards Act, Section 62, Section 62, Section 24
PERSON: RANCHI Cr, Seth Purty Son, Kumar Sharma Son, H.R., Kumar Gupt, Alok Lal, Addl, Das, Aneeta Hada Vs, Sangeeta Rani, Aneeta Hada, Aneeta Hada, Aneeta Hada, R. N. Verma
CARDINAL: 355, 1, 48, 30.09.2004, 5, 2, 198, two, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 3, 1, 3, 5, 6, 5, 1, 2, 1, two, 1, 7, 4
ORG: Hindusthan Copper Limited, PO & PS Ghatshila, District- East Singhbhum 2, Hindusthan Copper Limited, PO & PS Ghatshila, District- East Singhbhum, Petitioner(s, The State of Jharkhand 2, Weights & Measures, PO & PS Ghatshila, JUSTICE, Petitioner(s, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Standard Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, Hindustan Copper Limited, Travels, Tours Private Limited, the Hindustan Copper Limited, Company M/s. Hindusthan Copper Limited, Company, Supreme Court, Criminal Appeal, Sharad Kumar Sanghi Vs, State, Controller, Controller, Supreme Court
GPE: Prasun, Govt, Jharkhand
LOC: East Singhbhum
DATE: 10.12.2007, 47, 1985, 1985, 15.09.2003, 23.04.2007, 2012, 58
WORK_OF_ART: Ghatshila in C/2
FAC: Sections 45
TIME: such hours