Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Seth Purty and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Decided On : Sep-11-2015

Court : Jharkhand

LAW: Section 62, Section 24 and Section 62, Section 24, the Standards Act, the Standards Act, Section 62, Section 62, Section 24

PERSON: RANCHI Cr, Seth Purty Son, Kumar Sharma Son, H.R., Kumar Gupt, Alok Lal, Addl, Das, Aneeta Hada Vs, Sangeeta Rani, Aneeta Hada, Aneeta Hada, Aneeta Hada, R. N. Verma

CARDINAL: 355, 1, 48, 30.09.2004, 5, 2, 198, two, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 3, 1, 3, 5, 6, 5, 1, 2, 1, two, 1, 7, 4

ORG: Hindusthan Copper Limited, PO & PS Ghatshila, District- East Singhbhum 2, Hindusthan Copper Limited, PO & PS Ghatshila, District- East Singhbhum, Petitioner(s, The State of Jharkhand 2, Weights & Measures, PO & PS Ghatshila, JUSTICE, Petitioner(s, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Standard Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, Hindustan Copper Limited, Travels, Tours Private Limited, the Hindustan Copper Limited, Company M/s. Hindusthan Copper Limited, Company, Supreme Court, Criminal Appeal, Sharad Kumar Sanghi Vs, State, Controller, Controller, Supreme Court

GPE: Prasun, Govt, Jharkhand

LOC: East Singhbhum

DATE: 10.12.2007, 47, 1985, 1985, 15.09.2003, 23.04.2007, 2012, 58

WORK_OF_ART: Ghatshila in C/2

FAC: Sections 45

TIME: such hours

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //