State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Johri Mal

Decided On : Apr-21-2004

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Chapter XXI, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Article 13 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 309 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, Article 166 of the Constitution, Article 13 of the Constitution of India

ORG: S.B. Sinha, Legal Remembrancer's, the District Government Counsel, the Allahabad High Court, The State of Uttar Pradesh, District Government Counsel, The State of Uttar Pradesh, the High Court, the High Court, the District Government Counsel, District Government Counsel, the District Magistrate, The State Government, DGC (Criminal, Allahabad, the District Magistrate, DSC (Criminal, the State Government, opined:'The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, High Courts, Judicial Officers, the District Court, CJM, Criminal, Civil, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, Government, Government, the District Magistrate, DGC (Criminal, the State Government, the High Court, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, Justice, Legal Remembrancer, Government of Uttar Pradesh, the Uttar Pradesh Legal Remembrancer, High Court, State, the High Court, Reliance, U.P., State, U.P., Ors, U.P. State Law Officers Association and Ors, State, U.P., the High Court, State, The Central Government, Additional Public Prosecutors, the Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor, Additional Public Prosecutor, District Magistrate, the State Government, the Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor, the District Magistrate, State, the State Government, Additional Public Prosecutor, the State Government, Government, Additional Public Prosecutor, the District Magistrate, U.P., the High Courts', Legal Remembrancer's, the State Government, District Government Counsel, Government, Government Counsel, State, Government Counsel, District Magistrate, Bar, District Government Counsel, District Government Counsel, Sub-District Government Counsel, District Government Counsel, the Legal Remembrancer the District, the State Government, the State Government, District Government, District Government Counsel, Government, District Government Counsel, District Government Counsel, the Legal Remembrancer, District Government Counsel, District Government Counsel, Judicial, State, the District Government Counsel, the Government Counsel, District Government Counsel, DGC (Criminal, the High Court, the State Government, Additional Public Prosecutor, Public Prosecutor or, the State Government, The State Government, District Magistrate, the Public Prosecutor and Additional Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor, The State of Uttar Pradesh, State, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial, Court, See Life Insurance Corporation v. Escorts Ltd., Ors, F.C.I., Ors, National Highway Authority of, Tata Cellular v. Union of India : AIR1996SC11, Monarch Infrastructure, Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and Ors, W.B. State Electricity Board, Patel Engineering Co. Ltd., Ors, Consumer Education, State, State, State, Council of Civil Services Unions, the Civil Service, AC 374, the House of Lords, Court, the House of Lords, the House of Lords, Abbasi, State, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, State for Home Department, Lord Cross, Cattermole, Court, Court, Court, International, Counsel of Civil Services Unions, the High Court, State, Court, Tribunal, Government, Court, State, SR, Review, Legality, Judicial, Parliament, Court, Judicial, Home, Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, the North Wales Police v. Evans, Court, Judicial Remedies, Court, Judicial Review, the House of Lords in Council of Civil Service Unions, the Civil Service, Council, Bar, State, State Government, Public Prosecutor, State, Court, State, State, State, State, Associated Picture House, Wednesbury Corporation, Ors, v. Union of India, State, See Union of India v., State, State, State, State, State, inter alia, Legislature, State, Public Prosecutors, State, State

NORP: J.INTRODUCTION:1, Sessions, Sessions, R., Indian, American

GPE: C.M.W.P. Nos, India, India, Judges, D.G.C., Lucknow, Judiciary.10, Hindi, Gujarat, L.I.C., UK, US

DATE: 34064, 19513, 34074, 26613, 41178, 41180, 5667, 1992, 9203, 3100, 3102, 1999, 6754, 1973, 17.09.1997, one year, 18.9.1998, 17.09.1998, 18.09.1998, 11.12.1998, 1998, 11th September, 1998, 12.9.1998.9, the next three months, 10 years, 7 years, 5 years, '18, Para 7.04, 7.06, one year, three years, At least three months, '20, five years, the period of three years, every three years, three years, '21, 2001, 1985, '26, 2002, November 2002, '27, '28, 1876, 113)29, 33-35, '30, 1982, '32, '33, '34, '35, the sixteenth century, '36, 1947, 2001

CARDINAL: 40945, 1998.FACTUAL, 1, 4, 5, 6, 12.03.1996, 1, four, two, five, four, two, 1993CriLJ3140, 1994]1SCR348, 2, 6, one, one, 4).(6, 5, 16.2.1991, 1, 1, 4, 5, 6, 7.02, 3, 7.07, 7.08, 1, 9, 1, 2, 1, 9, three, 7.08.(6, 21.08, 1, 4, 5, 6, 1993]2SCR497, 1994]3SCR163, 1994]2SCR67, 2, 451, 210:'In, 94, one, 3, 141, 294, 551, one, 2, 2, 3

PERSON: Legal Remembrancer, Ashok, Kumar Srivastava, Meerut, Srivastava, Harpal Singh, Chandra Sharma, Kumar, Cadre, Cadre, Para 7.01, Legal Remembrancer, Paras, Addl, Jagannath Dutta, Meghji Pethraj Shah Charitable, Issac Peter, Ganga Enterprises, Anr, Anr, Daw Oliver, CCSU, CCSU, Adan, Administrative Law, fact;s, Bernard Schwartz, Clive Lewis, John Alder, Law, Scamah, Roskili, Administrative Law, Samarendra Das, Naveen Jindal, Anr

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, 1986(8)ECC189, first, first

LOC: the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Judge, the District Officer, District, the District Judge, the District Officer

WORK_OF_ART: Special Reference No, bodies:(ii, 8th Edition, Wednesbury Unreasonableness'

PRODUCT: Para 7.03, Para 7.05, Para 21.04, Scope

FAC: Grahame Aldous

LANGUAGE: English