Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Krishna Mango Processing Factory Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Decided On : Dec-19-1989

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 16, Article 226, Section 25, Section 25, Section 14, Act 74 of 1956, Section 25, the Sales Tax Act

CARDINAL: 1, 3, 2, 429/78-79, 1, 2, 3, 6, 1, 2, 3, 429/78-79, 1.4, 6, 57, 2252, 6, 1, 1, three, three, one, 47, 9, 18, 39, 6, one

ORG: the High Court, Tribunal, the Bengal Finance, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Commercial Tax Officer, Malda, the Bengal Finance, the Bengal Finance, the Bengal Finance, the Bengal Finance, fig, observed--'"in, Learned Advocate, See Indo International Industries, Sales Tax, U.P., SC, AIR 1981, Stale of West, SC, the Bengal Finance, The Supreme Court, Act

DATE: 1980, 1941, 1956, 1382, 1383, 70,783.95, 9th June, 1969, 1954, 17th June, 1975, 5th July, 1978, 10th July, 1986, 1941, June 1969, 27th June, 1975, 9th June, 1969, 1941, the 9th June, 1969, 1941, 1941, 1954, 1954, 1954, 1954, the 1st July, 1967, 1941, 1954, 1956, 1964, daily, 1981, 1079, 1966, 1977, 1941, 1941

GPE: B.S., B.S., F.T., F.T., F.T., monacca, P.A., Thillai

ORDINAL: 9th, first, first

PERSON: khasta badarn, raisin, zahedi, kanchakala, Majumdar, Chidambara Nadar v., Washi Ahmed

LOC: mango

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //