Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mohd. Hanif and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Oct-11-2006

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Patna

LAW: Rule 10, a Constitutional Bench, Article 309 of the Constitution of India, Article 309 of the Constitution of India, the Constitutional Bench, the Constitution of India, Article 309 of the Constitution of India, a Constitutional Bench, the Constitutional Bench, Article 309, Constitution, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Para 34, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 142 of the Constitution of India, Article 142 of the Constitution, Article 12 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Article 309, Schedule-II, Section 21, the A.T. Act

CARDINAL: 1, more than one, 686/05, 806/05, 178/06, 9, 156, 189, 8, 156, 189, 17/04, 110/06, 3, 2, 363, 2006(4, five, One, one, 9, 179, one, 6, 143, one, one, one, 1988(2, one, 2, 2006(2, 1, 3, 24, three, 55, 229, 16, 28, two, two, 23.01.2002, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 16.08.2005.In, one

ORG: Group, Group, Group, GPF, Group, GPF, 740/05, the Postal Department, Group, the Revised Recruitment Rules, Extra Departmental, Scheme, Counsels, the Supreme Court, State, SC, the Apex Court, Umadevi, Railway, Schemes, Scheme, Railway Ministry, the Apex Court, Indrapal Yadav v.Union of India, Schemes, the Apex Court, Umadevi, the Apex Court, Umadevi, Court, the Union of India, the State Governments, Group, the Apex Court, Umadevi, Group, Group, Group, Scheme, Their Lordships of, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Group, Tribunal, Umadevi, State, Schemes, Central Government Departments, Schemes, Umadevi, Central Government, O.A. 338 of, Tribunal, Tribunal, Advocate, Tribunal, the Apex Court, Umadevi, Umadevi, Group, Tribunal, Tribunal, Group, the Union of India, the Apex Court, Umadevi, Counsel, the Apex Court, Cooperative Societies, Counsel, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Umadevi, Umadevi, the Supreme Court, Legislature, Court, the Apex Court, Apex Court, Schemes, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Umadevi, Schemes, the Supreme Court, Schemes, Court/Tribunal, the Supreme Court.16, Standing Counsel, Counsel, Umadevi, Judicial Service, the High Court, State, Tribunal, Standing Counsel, Scheme, the Apex Court, Union of India, Schemes, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Umadevi.19, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the High Courts, Lordships, the High Court, Government, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Courts, Lordships, State of Mysore v. S.V. Narayanappa 1966, Indlaw SC, the Apex Court, Court, State, Ors, SC, Indlaw SC 600, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Umadevi, Lordships, Emphasis, the Apex Court, the Union of India, the State Governments, the Union of India, the State Governments, Umadevi, Court, Daily Rated Casual Labour v. Union of India and, SC, Indlaw SC 597, the Hon'ble Court, Posts, Telegraph Department, Court, State, Bhagwati Prasad, Delhi State Mineral Development Corporation, Indlaw SC 347, Court, Umadevi, High Courts, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Umadevi, State of Himachal Pradesh, Court, Central Coalfields Limited v., The Management of Bhurkunda Colliery 2006, SC, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Umadevi, Court, Nalanda College 1961, Indlaw SC 58, Court, Scheme, the State of Karnataka, Court, Dharwad Distt, PWD Literate Daily Wage Employees Association, Karnataka and Ors, Indlaw SC 723, Lordships, Dharwadcase the Supreme Court, Court, Umadevi, R.N. Nanjundapa, T. Thimmiah, Court, State, Court, the Apex Court, State, SC, Indlaw SC, Umadevi, Ors, Indlaw SC 952, the Apex Court, High Courts, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Institute of Management Development, U.P., the Supreme Court, U.P., Indlaw SC 1292, the Apex Court, State of Himachal Pradesh, Lordships, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Umadevi, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Cooperative Societies and Ors, the Supreme Court, State, State, the Supreme Court, Kesavananda, Bharati, Indlaw SC 537, Indira Sawhney v. Union of India 1999, the Supreme Court, Court, Umadevi, Bench, the Apex Court, Umadevi, Umadevi, Standing Counsel, the Apex Court, Umadevi, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Umadevi, the Supreme Court, a High Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Umadevi, Umadevi, Ministries/Departments, the Union of India, Umadevi, Tribunal, the Department of Posts, Department of Posts (Group ', the Ministry of Communication, Peons, SI, SI, Gramin Dak Sevaks, the Recruiting Division or Unit, Gramin Dak Sevaks, Division or Unit, SI, SI, Gramin Dak Sevaks, Tribunal, Group, Umadevi, Group, Group, Group, Tribunal, the Apex Court, Union of India, Ajay Kumar Raut v. Union of India, the Apex Court, Tribunal, Scheme, Scheme, the Courts/Tribunals, Tribunal, the Apex Court, Umadevi, Umadevi, Umadevi, Umadevi, Hon'ble Patna High Court, the Union of India and Ors, Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna and Ors, Tribunal, the Postal Department, Group

GPE: O.A., O.As, O.A. 338, O.A., O.A., Counsel, Karnataka v. Umadevi 2006, Rudra, Rudra, Rudra, Counsels, S.V. Narayanappa, O.A., O.A. 435, Counsel, Counsels, O.A. 867, O.A., O.A., O.A., Counsel, O.A., O.A., India, Rudra, Counsels, Karnataka, India, Karnataka, Kerala, India, mandate.27, Counsel, Rudra, Rudra, Rudra, Rudra, Rudra, Umadevi.30, O.As, Counsels, Umadevi.34, O.A., department.36, Tribunal, O.A., CWJC, O.A., O.A., O.A.

DATE: 2005, 1987, 177/06, 2006, 9, 2006, 2002, 2003, 2003, 10.09.2003, 615/04, 2004, 2006, 1993, Para 44, ten years, ten years, daily, more than 120 days, 360 days, more than 120 days, 360 days, the age of 25 years, Para 44, 2001, three years, 1989, three years, Para 44, 2002, 2003, 272 of 2006, Para 44, three years, 2006, 2005, 10.01.2005, Para 44, 2004, Para 45, Para 13, daily, the day, 1979, Para 44, ten years, ten years, daily, 1987, daily, more than one year, daily, 1989, daily, daily, Para 26, Para 38, 1990, monthly, daily, daily, 1992, 1992, 1991, 1992, one to two years, 1973, daily, Para 45, 2002, 2004, 1993, 1993, 1993, a period of two years, 240 full days, any particular year, 206 days, a five days, a number of years, 2004, 2905, 2005, two months, 2004, 1 1/2 years, one year, 2005

TIME: their working hours, eight hours, four hours, working hours, the working hours, hours

PERSON: causal labourers, Misc, Postman, Counsels, Gautam Bose, Gautam Bose, Kumar Sain v. Union, Kumar Sain, a Larger Bench, Kumar Sain, DOP&T, Bose, Counsels, Bose, R.N. Nanjundappa, B.N. Nagarjan, S.A. Alam, J.K. Karn, M.P. Dixit, Dixit, Dixit, J.K. Karn, S.K. Bariar, Misc, Bariar, M.K. Mishra, R. Uma Rani, Registrar, Mishra, Mukund Jee, R.K. Choubey, G.K. Agarwal, R.N. Choudhary, Sarvesh Kr, Singh, Addl, Mukund Jee, Kumar Sain's, Counsels, Mohan Pal, Counsel, Dharwad, R.N. Nanjundappa v. T.Thimmiah, Anr, B.N. Nagarajan, Lordships, Kumar Verma, Ray Shivendra Bahadur, Karanatka, Anr, Haryana, Piara Singh, Lordships, Wadhoc, Surinder Kumar, Pushpa Srivastava, Madhyamik Shiksha, A. Umarani v. Registrar, Bench, A. Umarani, Articles 14, Gautam Bose, Counsels, Kumar Sain, Kumar Sain, Kumar Sain, Sain, Kumar Sain, Kumar Sain, Misc, Misc, Box Peons, Casual Labourers, Counsels, Mohan Pal, Mohan Pal's, Paragraphs

PERCENT: 25%, 25%, 75%, 25%, 75%, 25%

WORK_OF_ART: Scheme for Grant of Temporary Status and Regularisation of Casual Labourers, Scheme, Scheme of the Postal Department, The Workmen of Bhurkunda Colliery of, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme

PRODUCT: Circular, Executive, Para 45

FAC: Constitutional, 09.08.1991

LOC: Para 15

NORP: Indian, Rules, Rules, Rules

ORDINAL: First, firstly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //