Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Constable Pawan Kumar Vs. Delhi Administration and anr.
Decided On : Dec-16-1998
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
LAW: Section 21 of DP Act
CARDINAL: 1, two, 30.4.91, 1,7.89, 30.6.89, 9.7.89, 15.7.89, 28.7.89, 29.7.89, 329, 170, 4, 5, four, 1, 1, 29, 1995(5, 778, 2, 464, 6, 415, 261, 3, two, 8
GPE: O.As, Police Delhi, Delhi, IV, Counsel, Counsel, O.A.
ORG: the Appellate Authority, Constable Rajesh Kumar, B.S.F. Academy, Takenpur Gwalior, Medically, the Civil Surgeon, BSF Academy Takenpur, Model Town Police Station/Delhi, Enquiry Officers, PW III &, Constable Pawan, DCP, the Apex Court, Glaxo Laboratories, Labour Court, Counsel, the Hon'ble Court, Standing Order 22, The Disciplinary Authority, the National Exchequer, Institute, the Apex Court, Ors, Tribunal, Delhi Administration and Ors, CAT, the Court/Tribunal, Appellate Authority, The Court/Tribunal, Counsel, the Apex Court, Central Bank of India, the Punishing Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Counsel, the Disciplinary Authority, Tribunal, AIR 1928 PC, State Bank of Patiala, SC, Original Applications, the Appellate Orders
DATE: 2 years, 8.7.89, 1978, 1984, two years, 1998, 1996, two years', 1997(5, 62, two years, JT 1996, two years, two years
PERSON: Pawan Kumar, Rajesh Kumar 170/Cr, Ashok Aggarwal, Shanti Bhushan, Standing Order, Rajinder Pandita, B.C. Chaturvedi v. U.O.I, U.O. I., Pandita, S.K. Singh v., Singh Nirdosh, Takenpura, Buckmaster, T.B. Barrett v. African Products Ltd., S.K. Sharma, Rlys
FAC: Govt.
WORK_OF_ART: Pawan Kumar No, Meerut and Ors, Punjab State Civil Supplies Corpn.
NORP: Hari
PRODUCT: Prakash