Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ashok Kumar Sahoo Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Feb-19-2003

Court : Orissa

GPE: Panigrahi, O.A., Tulasipur, O.B.C., O.A., S.T., O.B.C.

NORP: J.1, S.T.

CARDINAL: 8.8.2000, 571, 3, 1, 2, 3.2, 1, 2, 29.7.1999, 3, 571, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 18,000/-, 3, 3, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 18,000/-, 3, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2

ORG: the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack, Tribunal, Extra Departmental Sub-Post Master, GDSSPM, Banki Sub-Post Office, Board of Secondary Examination, the Central Administrative Tribunal, GDSSPM, Tribunal, GDSSPM, O.B.C., GDSSPM, Tribunal, GDSSPM, Tribe, the Board of Secondary Examination, Tribunal, the Board of Secondary Examination, Tribunal, Tahasildar, Tribunal, the Revenue Inspector, B.P. Das

PERSON: Cuttack Bench, Scheduled Caste, Mohanty, Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Caste, O. B. C., Scheduled Tribe, J.8

DATE: 1999, 1999, 18,000/- per year

PERCENT: 64%

EVENT: the opp.party No

ORDINAL: First

LOC: Tahasildar

PRODUCT: videAnnexure-8

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //