Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Nakul Sahu Vs. State of Orissa

Decided On : Mar-15-2007

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 302, Section 27, Section 27, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act

PERSON: S. Panda, Addl, Angul, Sambari Biswal, bush, Tangia, Sambari Biswal, Nos, Tangia, Tangi, Tangia, Tangia, Kotha Ghara'

NORP: J.1, Hadibanu, M.O.-I

DATE: 1997, 30th October, 1995, about 55 years, the same day, About six months

TIME: 3.00 p.m., about 4.30 p.m.

ORDINAL: second, first, first

ORG: Ext.2, Court, Trial Court, Sambari, Court, Court, Court, Court, Hadibandhu, Such Hadibarju/Hadibandhu, P.W. 5, P.W. 10, the State Forensic Science and Laboratory, Ext, the S.F.S.L Ext, lacking.12, P.W. 4, P.W. 4, Court, P.W. 7, The Jail Criminal Appeal

CARDINAL: fifteen, 15, five, as many as five, 1 1/2, 1/2, 3/4, 1/2, 2, 3/4, 2);(4, 1, 1/2, 2, 3, 4, 27.12.1995, two, one, one, 26, 11, 13

PRODUCT: P.W. 15, P.W. 15, P.W. 15, P.W. 15, P.W. 15, P.W. 15, P.W. 15, P.W. 1, P.W. 2, P.W. 4, Suresh, P.W. 12, P.W. 15, P.W. 4, P.W. 4, P.W. 8

QUANTITY: one inch

FAC: Sections 25

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //