Director-general of Vs. Sahara India Saving and

Decided On : Sep-06-1989

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

LAW: Section 12A(2, Order 39, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 12A, Section 36B(c, Section 36B(c, Section 36A(1, Section 12A(2, Rule 4, Order 39, Section 12A(1, Section 50, Order 39, Section 12A, Section 57, Section 50, Section 13, Order 39, Section 12A(2

CARDINAL: 1, 2A, 2, 497, 1(a, 2, 2, 3, 1, two, 30,000, 30,000, 4, 4, 5, 1, 1988.7, two, 8, five, 150, 197, 205, 300, 250, 300, 350, 400, 1, five, 1.9, 24, 12, 13, 10, 10, 1, 17, 1, 1, 1., 1, 1.20, 66, 524, 66, 1.24, 1, 2, two, 1, 2, 1, 2, 11

ORG: the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Restrictive Trade Practices Enquiry No, Commission, the Hindustan Times, the Deccan Herald, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act.4, Great Independence, Reserve Bank of India, the Hindustan Times, Deccan Herald, Reserve Bank, the Hindustan Times, Reserve Bank's, Gold Leaf Cash Certificate, Bench, Clauses (ii, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Reserve Bank of India, "Regarding Reserve Bank, the Hindustan Times, Reserve Bank's, Gold Leaf Cash Certificate, the Hindustan Times, Deposit Schemes, Sahara India Savings, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, Deposit Schemes, Deposit Schemes, Commission, Commission, Sahara India Savings, the Sahara India Group, the Sahara India Group, Deposit Scheme, Commission, Government, Sahara India Group, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, the Director-General, the "MRTP Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, inter alia, The Supreme Court, Lakhanpal National Ltd., MRTPC, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Supreme Court, The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, the Gauhati High Court, AIR 1980 Gauhati 1, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, Tihar, the Supreme Court, Rama Dayal Markarha, AIR 1978, SC

DATE: 1969, 1987, October 6, 1988, August 14, 1987, September 1, 1987, Tuesday, September 1, 1987, August 14, 1987, September 1, 1987, August 14, 1987, August 1, 1987, December 18, 1987, June 3, August 14, 1987, June 3, 1988, December 18, 1987, July 20, 1988, December 18, 1987, June 3, 1988, December 18, 1987, June 3, 1988, June 3, 1988, June 3, 1988, June 3, 1988, June 3, 1988, today, 7 years to, 10 years, annually, 3rd June, 1988, 1989, Section 36A, 21, three months, today, the sixth day of September, 1989

ORDINAL: first, first, second, third, second, third, first, fourth, fifth, sixth, sixth, sixth, fifth, sixth, sixth, fifth, sixth, sixth, sixth, sixth

PERSON: Nos, Sudhir Namasudra v. Purnendu, Kumar Das

LOC: Sahara India, Sahara India's, Sahara India, Sahara India, Sahara India's, Sahara India's, Sahara India, Sahara India's, Sahara India, Sahara India, Sahara India, Sahara India, the Central Jail

WORK_OF_ART: Gold Leaf Cas(sic, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practice Commission, Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission

NORP: saharians

GPE: India, Madhya Pradesh

QUANTITY: 6.00 p. m."

MONEY: 150 per cent, 197 per cent, 205 per cent, 300 per cent

PRODUCT: advertisement.10

PERCENT: 80%

TIME: 2.30 p.m.