Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The State Vs. Satyanarayan Mallik

Decided On : Nov-18-1964

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 47, Section 165, Section 165 Cr., Section 165, Section 165, Section 353, the Sarpanch of Gambhari Punchayet, Section 103, Section 47, Section 55, Section 13(b, Section 47, Section 47(b

ORG: G.K. Misra, Court, State, Standing Counsel, Court, Trial Court's, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, State, AIR 1960, SC, Lordships, Kerala 8 (FB, Lordships, the Supreme Court, Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963, SC, Sections 103, Court, AIR 1960, SC, Court, Uttar Pradesh, Standing Counsel, Magistrate, Makhmal Fool, Magistrate, Court

CARDINAL: 1, 55, 22, one, 22, 2., two, 1, 2, 3., 165, 1, 5, 1, 1, 3, 822, 165, two, 1, 2, 411, two, one, 22, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, two, fourteen, three, two, 22, 4., 1, 2, 5.

DATE: 47, 27-7-1963, 1961, 1956, fourteen, two months

GPE: Bihar, Rajasthan v. Rehman, Cochan, Velayudhan v. State of, Kerala, AIR, Kerala, Singh v. State of, Deshi, Bihar, Bihar, Bihar, Bihar

WORK_OF_ART: The Excise Sub-Inspector

PERSON: P. W. 3, Ganja, Ganja, P. W. 3, P. W. 3, Patnaik, I. P. C., Radha Kishan v. State, Lordships, Jaw, P. W. 2, P. W. 1, Law, Ganja, P. Ws, Ganja, Ganja, Ganja, P. W. 3, Ganja, Ganja, Ganja, Ganja, Ganja, Ganja, P. W. 3, Ganja

PRODUCT: 210, 210

QUANTITY: 33 grams, 35 grams

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //