Semantic Analysis by spaCy
The State Vs. Satyanarayan Mallik
Decided On : Nov-18-1964
Court : Orissa
LAW: Section 47, Section 165, Section 165 Cr., Section 165, Section 165, Section 353, the Sarpanch of Gambhari Punchayet, Section 103, Section 47, Section 55, Section 13(b, Section 47, Section 47(b
ORG: G.K. Misra, Court, State, Standing Counsel, Court, Trial Court's, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, State, AIR 1960, SC, Lordships, Kerala 8 (FB, Lordships, the Supreme Court, Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963, SC, Sections 103, Court, AIR 1960, SC, Court, Uttar Pradesh, Standing Counsel, Magistrate, Makhmal Fool, Magistrate, Court
CARDINAL: 1, 55, 22, one, 22, 2., two, 1, 2, 3., 165, 1, 5, 1, 1, 3, 822, 165, two, 1, 2, 411, two, one, 22, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, two, fourteen, three, two, 22, 4., 1, 2, 5.
DATE: 47, 27-7-1963, 1961, 1956, fourteen, two months
GPE: Bihar, Rajasthan v. Rehman, Cochan, Velayudhan v. State of, Kerala, AIR, Kerala, Singh v. State of, Deshi, Bihar, Bihar, Bihar, Bihar
WORK_OF_ART: The Excise Sub-Inspector
PERSON: P. W. 3, Ganja, Ganja, P. W. 3, P. W. 3, Patnaik, I. P. C., Radha Kishan v. State, Lordships, Jaw, P. W. 2, P. W. 1, Law, Ganja, P. Ws, Ganja, Ganja, Ganja, P. W. 3, Ganja, Ganja, Ganja, Ganja, Ganja, Ganja, P. W. 3, Ganja
PRODUCT: 210, 210
QUANTITY: 33 grams, 35 grams