Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kalyan Singh Vs. Kalyan Singh and anr.

Decided On : Jan-11-2008

Court : Uttaranchal

LAW: Section 30, Section 4 of Workmen's Compensation Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act

PERSON: Rajesh Tandon, Heard Shri Yogesh Pandey, Kalyan Singh, Bareilly, Kashmir Singh v. Santosh Singh Patiner

NORP: J.1

ORG: Shri D.S. Patni, Shri Deepak Rawat, the Court of Commissioner, Jeep, Almora Base Hospital, Jeep, Jeep, Jeep, the Oriental] Insurance Company Ltd., Jeep, The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Jeep, P.W.I., Jeep, The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, the Chief Medical Officer, The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, the Workmen's Compensation, Santosh Singh Patiner, the Division Bench, this High Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Court, the Workmen's Compensation

CARDINAL: 1, 2.2, 4/2002, 1, 29/1001, 1, 2,000/-towards, 12, 2,000/-, 1, 1923.9, 1, 2006.11, 2

EVENT: Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act

DATE: July 22, 2005, October 4, 2001, about 3 5 years, monthly, November 30

GPE: Workmen, Workmen, Simalkhet, F.I.R., Singh, A.O., evidence.12

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //