Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Kalyan Singh Vs. Kalyan Singh and anr.
Decided On : Jan-11-2008
Court : Uttaranchal
LAW: Section 30, Section 4 of Workmen's Compensation Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act
PERSON: Rajesh Tandon, Heard Shri Yogesh Pandey, Kalyan Singh, Bareilly, Kashmir Singh v. Santosh Singh Patiner
NORP: J.1
ORG: Shri D.S. Patni, Shri Deepak Rawat, the Court of Commissioner, Jeep, Almora Base Hospital, Jeep, Jeep, Jeep, the Oriental] Insurance Company Ltd., Jeep, The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Jeep, P.W.I., Jeep, The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, the Chief Medical Officer, The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, the Workmen's Compensation, Santosh Singh Patiner, the Division Bench, this High Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Court, the Workmen's Compensation
CARDINAL: 1, 2.2, 4/2002, 1, 29/1001, 1, 2,000/-towards, 12, 2,000/-, 1, 1923.9, 1, 2006.11, 2
EVENT: Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act
DATE: July 22, 2005, October 4, 2001, about 3 5 years, monthly, November 30
GPE: Workmen, Workmen, Simalkhet, F.I.R., Singh, A.O., evidence.12