Skip to content

Devendra Sharma Vs. Sandhya - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: May-20-2006

Court: Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 28, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 12(1)(d

PERSON: S.L. Jain, Mhowranipur, Shri A.K. Choubey, Devendra Sharma, Honeymoon, R.N. Sharma, Shiv Narain, Vinod Kumar, Appellant Devendra, Devi Pooja, Devi Pooja, Devi Pooja, Devi Pooja, Exh, Mhowranipur, Exh, Exh, Devendra

NORP: J.1, Hindu, P-1

ORG: Court, First Addl, Pooja of Goddess, New Bhopal Hospital, Pooja of Goddess, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, Learned Counsel, Trial Court, Pooja of Goddess, Vinod Kumar, P.W. 5, Narmada Prasad, the Trial Court, Village Pipariya, Court, The Trial Court, The Trial Court, the Trial Court, the Appellate Court, An Appellate Court, the Trial Court, Court

DATE: 1955, 8-12-97, 6th July, 1992, that day, that day, three weeks, the next day, 2-4 days, 12 weeks, a day, 20-22 days, a day, two months, the day, 20-5-92, 7-7-92, 10-12 days, 1-2 days, 2 days, one year

GPE: Raisen, Counsel, New Hospital, Shankerlal

WORK_OF_ART: Matrimonial Case No

CARDINAL: 44, 5, 24, 12, 6-5-92, 6, 1, 26, 5, three, 1, 6, 2, 5, 7, 6, 6-5, 12, 10-12, 1, 2, 3

TIME: few hours

ORDINAL: first

FAC: the Pooja of Goddess

LOC: the Devi Pooja, the Pooja of Goddess

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //