Skip to content

Ramkishan Vs. the State - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided On : Nov-30-2000

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW:

Section 302, the Indian Penal Code

CARDINAL:

1, 88/86, 22-3-1985, 3, 16-4-1986, 3/4, 1, 2, two, 23-3-1985, 12, one, 8, 3, 1, 8, 3

DATE:

10th March, 1989, PW 5, the day, PW 5

ORDINAL:

Second

PERSON:

Sagar, Dhaniram, Purshottam, Hemraj, Dhaniram, S.L. Kochar, S.K. Gangrade, Kochar, Gangrade, Purshottam, Kochar, Sri Kochar, Kochar, Gangrade, Sri Kochar, Kochar, Sri Kochar, Girish, Kumar Dubey

TIME:

8.30 p.m., 12.15 p.m.

ORG:

Naik, T.A. Battalion, P.D. Mehar, P.W., the Investigating Officer P.W. 7, P.D. Mehar, Army, Gwalior, object.(2, Magistrate, the Court of Sessions, P.W. 2 Buaram Tiwari, Autopsy, P.W. 4, Constable, the Police Station, Pyarelal, PW 8), P.W. 8 Pyarelal, P.W. 5, P.W. 5, Pyarelal

PRODUCT:

Dhaniram, P.W. 5 Purshottam ad P.W. 8 Pyarelal, P.W. 5, P.W. 8, P.W. 5, P.W. 5, P.W. 8, P.W. 8, P.W. 5, P.W. 5, P.W. 8, P.W. 1

GPE:

Hukumchand, Pyarelal, P.L., Sri Gangrade

NORP:

Girish, Girish

QUANTITY:

2 mm

EVENT:

post-mortem.4

LOC:

P.W. 5 Purshottam, P.W. 5 Purshottam

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //