Skip to content

Bhola Vs. State of M.P. and ors. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Sep-22-2008

Court: Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Article 226/227, Section 3, Section 4-A of Public Gambling Act, Section 120-B, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 4-A of the Act of, Section 4-A of Public Gambling Act, Section 8, Section 3(2, Section 4-A of the Act of, Section 4-A of the Act of, Section 4-A of the Act, Excise Act, Section 4-A, Section 6, the Section 4-A, Section 4-A of the Act of, Section 3(2, Section 8 of Adhiniyam, Section 3,4,5, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3, Section 8 of Adhiniyam, Section 4-A of the Act, Section 6, Section 6, Section 3 or 4', Section 3 or, Section 4-A, Section 6, Section 4-A of the Public Gambling Act, Section 4-A of the Public Gambling Act, Section 3 or 4, the Public Gambling Act, Section 6, Section 6, Article 20 of Constitution of India, Article 20(1, Article 20, Article 20 of Constitution of India, Section 57, the Bombay Police Act, Section 57, the Bombay Police Act, Chapter XII, the Indian Penal Code, Section 9 or 23, Section 4, the Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 57, Section 6, Section 2, 'Section 3 or 4', Section 3 or, Section 3 or, Section 4-A of the Act, Section 6

ORG: ORDERSanjay Yadav, District Magistrate, Divisional, Sagar Division, Sections 5 and 6 of, Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, Sukhchain Ward, IPC, the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha, Sukhchain Ward, Court, State of M.P. and Ors, Govt, the Appellate Authority, Govt, Competent Authority, Govt, District Magistrate, ukjk;.k, dFku, x;sA3 izdj.k, fjdkMZ, dk izdj.k, iqf'V, rFkk, crk tk jgk gS, mijksDrkuqlkj Li'V gS fd vukosnd, mls, Sections 5 and 6, the District Magistrate, Court, District Magistrate, District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha, Single Bench, Court, Pappu @ Dinesh Gupta v. State ofM. P. and Ors, Paragraph 10, the Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, Gazette of Madhya Pradesh, Legislature, Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, Rajya Suraksha, State, Maharashtra, the Supreme Court, XVI, the Bombay Beggars Act, the Bombay Prevention of Prostitution Act, the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, XXV, the District Magistrate, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, the State Government, Maharashtra, Paragraphs 7, Phillimore, the Supreme Court, Phillimore, the Supreme Court, State, Maharashtra, the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha, the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, the Competent Authority, the Supreme Court, Haryana and Ors, U.P., State, Rajasthan v. Mangilal Pindwal, Court, the State Government, Court, Court, Legislative, Ors, Indian Tobacco Association, the Supreme Court, Court

NORP: J.1, Extra

GPE: India, District Sagar, Sanshodhan, Adhiniyam, Vakalatnama, Mkboj, Counsel, Sanshodhan, India, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Sanshodhan, Legislative, West U.P., West U.P., Govt, India

CARDINAL: 2, 3/2007, 24-6-2008, 2, 2, 2/4, As many as 23, 107, 110, 116, 151, five, 5, 2, 24-6-2008, 5, 6, 5, 4, 3, 115, 402.5, five, 107, 110, 116, 151, 3-8-2007, 22, 22, 22-11-07, 30-11-2007, 31, 107~116, 151, 6-3-2008, 7-3-2008, 2, 6, 5, 6, 1, 5, 6, 1, 5, 6, two, 5, 5, 3, 115, three, 5, three, 1, 1961CriLJ450, 12, 6, 8, 1, 556.'No, 1965]2SCR205, 1, 556, 25, one, 565, three, two, 7, 2

WORK_OF_ART: a Criminal Case No

PERSON: Sagar, Tehsil Deori, District Sagar, Adhiniyam, Adhiniyam, Adhiniyam, Adhiniyam, Jagannath Prasad, Counsel, Sagar, Counsel, gh vukosnd, kks esa fyIr gSA5, djs fd D;ksa, Adhiniyam, Counsel, Counsel, Adhiniyam, Notification, Vishnu Ramchandra, Vishnu Ramchandra, Rex, Bashiruddin Ashraf v. The Bihar Subai Sunni Majlis-Awaqf, Anr, J., Rex, Vishnu Ramchandra, Adhiniyam, Zile Singh v. State, Koteswar Vittal Kamath v. K. Rangappa, Veerappa Chettiar, Section Michael, Bench, Pougett

DATE: 1990, 1867, 1867, 1867, year 2006, the year 2006, 2006, 1867, 2969/2002, 2007, 1968, 1867, 1997, 1867, the year 2007, 1867, 1990, 1867, 1990, 30-8-2007, 30-8-2007, 1997, 1990, 1990, 4, 4, 4, 1990, 1867, 1990, 2006, 1990, 2007, a period of, three years, a period of, three years, 1860, 1945, 1923, 1923, three years, 1887, 1949, 1949, 1951, 1990, 2006, 1990, 2007, 1816, 1867

FAC: the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, Paragraphs 24, Mangilal Pindwal

QUANTITY: 4-2-2008

ORDINAL: first, first

LOC: Paragraph 12, Paragraph 10, Paragraph 27

EVENT: the Bombay Police Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //