Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Union of India Vs. Sanjay
Decided On : Sep-22-2001
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Section 123(c)(2, the Railways Act, Section 124A of the Railways Act, the Indian Railways Act, Rule 120, the Railways Act, the Railways Act, Section 175, Section 124A. Accident, Section 124A., Section 124A. Thus
ORG: ORDER1, the Union of India, the Railway Claims Tribunal, him.2, The Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, un, Tribunal, un, Tribunal, Tribunal, Railway, Court, Union of India, The Supreme Court, Union of India, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., AIR 1998, SC, Railway, Privy Council, Railways v. Me Dermot, AC 562, Charlesworth & Percy, Charlesworth & Percy, House of Lords, Metropolitan Railway Co., British Transport Commission, dismissed.8
CARDINAL: 2, only one, 640, 2, 637, 230, 1, 578, 115, 130, 131, five hundred, one thousand
NORP: Sanjay, Rules
PERCENT: 100%
PERSON: Railways, Railways, Mulko Bai, Donoghue v. Stevenson, Driver, Misc
DATE: 35455, 1989, 1989, 1994, 1999, 16-5-2001, 1966, 1932, 1992, 1921, 1956, 1989, one year, 1989, one month, two years, November 14, 1996
GPE: it.3, M.A., Ulahannan, AIR, Hare, India
ORDINAL: first, second, firstly, secondly
WORK_OF_ART: Negligence 7th Edn.
PRODUCT: Delaney
QUANTITY: some 60 yards