Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Union of India Vs. Sanjay

Decided On : Sep-22-2001

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 123(c)(2, the Railways Act, Section 124A of the Railways Act, the Indian Railways Act, Rule 120, the Railways Act, the Railways Act, Section 175, Section 124A. Accident, Section 124A., Section 124A. Thus

ORG: ORDER1, the Union of India, the Railway Claims Tribunal, him.2, The Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, un, Tribunal, un, Tribunal, Tribunal, Railway, Court, Union of India, The Supreme Court, Union of India, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., AIR 1998, SC, Railway, Privy Council, Railways v. Me Dermot, AC 562, Charlesworth & Percy, Charlesworth & Percy, House of Lords, Metropolitan Railway Co., British Transport Commission, dismissed.8

CARDINAL: 2, only one, 640, 2, 637, 230, 1, 578, 115, 130, 131, five hundred, one thousand

NORP: Sanjay, Rules

PERCENT: 100%

PERSON: Railways, Railways, Mulko Bai, Donoghue v. Stevenson, Driver, Misc

DATE: 35455, 1989, 1989, 1994, 1999, 16-5-2001, 1966, 1932, 1992, 1921, 1956, 1989, one year, 1989, one month, two years, November 14, 1996

GPE: it.3, M.A., Ulahannan, AIR, Hare, India

ORDINAL: first, second, firstly, secondly

WORK_OF_ART: Negligence 7th Edn.

PRODUCT: Delaney

QUANTITY: some 60 yards

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //