Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Satna Cement Vs. State
Decided On : Jul-24-1996
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: the Trade Unions Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.5, the Amending Act 56 of, Section 28E of the Trade Unions Act, Section 22, Section 35
GPE: T.S. Doabia, Tatha, Tatha, Madhya Pradesh, Thane
NORP: J.1
CARDINAL: two, 84, 846, 68, 261, 3, 505, 846, 33, 12, 84, 846
DATE: 1985, 1986, 1986, 1926, 1960, 1960, 1960, January 9, 1985, 1983, 1960, 1976, 1926, 1990, 1949, 1960, 1985, 1986, 1985, almost 10 years, 1971, 1985, 1986, August 29, 1996, six months
PERSON: Karamchari Sangh, Maihar, Satna, Anr.2, Satna, Satna, Maihar, Maihar Tehsil, Maihar Tehsil, Maihar Tehsil, Sundarjas Kanyalal Bhathija v., Registrar, Satna, the Maihar Tehsil, Maihar Tehsil, Maihar Tehsil, I.T. Officer, issues.8
ORG: Registrar of Representative Union and Ors, Satna Cement Factory, Quarry Mazdoor Congress, The State of M.P., The Satna Cement Factory, Quarry Mazdoor Congress, the M.P. Industrial Relations Act, The Trade Unions, M.P. Industrial Relations Act, Maihar, the M.P. Industrial Relations Act, The M.P. Industrial Relations Act, the Supreme Court of India, SC, Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, the State Government, the Supreme Court, Registrar, Registrar, the Supreme Court, Bareilly, SC, the High Court, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar
PERCENT: 35%, 51%, 35%, more than 51 %
MONEY: 1960 Act
FAC: Hirday Narain, the Maihar Tehsil