Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Satna Cement Vs. State

Decided On : Jul-24-1996

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: the Trade Unions Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.5, the Amending Act 56 of, Section 28E of the Trade Unions Act, Section 22, Section 35

GPE: T.S. Doabia, Tatha, Tatha, Madhya Pradesh, Thane

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: two, 84, 846, 68, 261, 3, 505, 846, 33, 12, 84, 846

DATE: 1985, 1986, 1986, 1926, 1960, 1960, 1960, January 9, 1985, 1983, 1960, 1976, 1926, 1990, 1949, 1960, 1985, 1986, 1985, almost 10 years, 1971, 1985, 1986, August 29, 1996, six months

PERSON: Karamchari Sangh, Maihar, Satna, Anr.2, Satna, Satna, Maihar, Maihar Tehsil, Maihar Tehsil, Maihar Tehsil, Sundarjas Kanyalal Bhathija v., Registrar, Satna, the Maihar Tehsil, Maihar Tehsil, Maihar Tehsil, I.T. Officer, issues.8

ORG: Registrar of Representative Union and Ors, Satna Cement Factory, Quarry Mazdoor Congress, The State of M.P., The Satna Cement Factory, Quarry Mazdoor Congress, the M.P. Industrial Relations Act, The Trade Unions, M.P. Industrial Relations Act, Maihar, the M.P. Industrial Relations Act, The M.P. Industrial Relations Act, the Supreme Court of India, SC, Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, the State Government, the Supreme Court, Registrar, Registrar, the Supreme Court, Bareilly, SC, the High Court, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar

PERCENT: 35%, 51%, 35%, more than 51 %

MONEY: 1960 Act

FAC: Hirday Narain, the Maihar Tehsil

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //