Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Kewalram

Decided On : Apr-19-1989

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 64(1, the Estate Duty Act, Section 39, the Insurance Act, a Division Bench, the Insurance Act, Section 39

ORG: G.G., the Appellate Tribunal, the Controller of Estate Duty (Appeals, CED, Estate of Pichai Thambi, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CED, CED, Mohanavelu Mudaliar, Indian Insurance and Banking Corporation Ltd., Sections 38, the Bombay High Court, CED, High Courts, Maharaja Bahadursingh Kasliwal v., Controller, Tribunal, Maharaja Bahadursingh Kasliwal v., the Appellate Tribunal

PERSON: Actg, C.J.1, Jabalpur Bench, Shri Harchamal, Seethalakshmi Ammal, Harendra Popatlal Gandhi, Krishna Lal Sadhu, Controller, Controller, Controller

GPE: Jabalpur, Maharaja

DATE: 1958, February 2, 1978, '39, 1957, 47, 0065/1928

CARDINAL: 1, 45,000, 2, three, 2, three, 15,000, 45,000, three, 1/4, 1978]111ITR711(Mad, 1979]116ITR96(MP, 2, 5, 4, 1966]61ITR317(Mad, 27, 39, 1, 1978]112ITR41(Bom, 45, 1979]116ITR96(MP, three, 45,000, 1/4, 1979]116ITR96(MP, three, 45,000

NORP: Harchamal, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Harchamal

PRODUCT: Mt. Promila

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //