Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Haji Usman Haji Mohammad Vs. State

Decided On : May-31-1957

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 46, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 301 of the Constitution and, Constitution, Section 9, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Constitution, The Ordinance No. 8, Act No, Customs Regulation Act Samvat, Section 10 of the Act, Section 3 of this Act, Section 9, Section 106 of the Act, Section 106 of Act No, Section 9, Section 9 of Act No, Section 3 of Act No, Section 3 of Act No, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Constitution, Article 301 of the Constitution and, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Article 366, Article 305, Article 301, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Constitution, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Article 19, Article 301, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Section 92, Article 301, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Article 226 of the Constitution on the ground, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301 of the Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 301, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Article 301, Article 301 of the Constitution, Article, Article 301, Article 301, Article 301, Article 301, Article 301, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301 of the Constitution, Article 301 of the Constitution, Article, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Section 92, the Australian Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, the Indian Constition, Article 19(1)(g, the Indian Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 301, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 304(b, Constitution, Article 304(b, the Australian Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19(1, Article 301, Article 304(b, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Article 304(b, Article 301, Article 304(b, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Article 304(b, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19(6, Section 92, the Australian Constitution, Article 301 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Article 32 of the Constitution, Constitution, Section 2, Article 301 of the Constitution of India.41, Article 301, Constitution, Article 301, Constitution, Article 301, Article 301, Article 304, Article 305, Constitution, Article 366, Article 372, Article 305, Article 301 of the Constitution, Article 301

NORP: J.1, inter-State, intra-State, inter-State, intra-State, Australian, Australian, Australian, Bharat, inter-State ', inter-State

PERSON: Haji Usman, Madhya Bharat, Madhya Bharat, Malgawa, Newaskar J., Madhya Bharat, Malwa, Madhya Bharat, Act.10, Ayat Niryat Kar Vidhan, Madhya Bharat, Madhya Bharat, Malgawa, Malgawa, Malgawa, Patel, Moti Lal v. Uttar Pradesh Government, Malik C. J., Agarwala J., Articles, Ahmad v. State, Saghir Ahmad, Mukerji J., Agarwala J. in, Chaturvedi J., Saghir Ahmad v. State of U. P., it.22, B. K. Mukherjea J., Saghir Ahmad's, Malgawa, B. K. Mukherjea, J., Madhya Bharat, Chin, Patel, Newaskar

DATE: Samvat 2006, 14th August, 1948, 2-11-1950, 14th August, 1948, January 26, 1950, 14th August, 1948, 2nd November, 1950, 26th January, 1950, 1948, 14th August, 1948, 1948, 14th August, 1948, 2005, 1949, Samvat 2006, 1949, 1949, 1949, 1949, 15th August, 1949, 1948, 1948, November, 1950, the year 1948, 26th January, 1950, 1949, '17, '18, 1951, 1950, 1949-2, '23, 1956, 22 of 1939, 1949-2, ' 31, 1948, June 1950, 1946, 1949, August 1949, 26th January 1950, 1949

ORG: Madhya Bharat Government Notification, Court, Bhopal State, Daulatpur Custom Post, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Magistrate, the Additional Sessions, the Customs Regulation Ordinance No, the State of Madhya Bharat, Customs Regulation Ordinance Samvat 2005.By Section 9, Government, the State Government, The Government oi Madhya Bharat, the State of Madhya Bharat, State, Government, the Supreme Court, AIR 1951, SC, the State of Madhya Bharat, State, State, State, State, State, the High Court of Allahabad, the U. P. State Road Transport Act, the Uttar Pradesh State Legislature, State, the High Court, the High Court, the U. P. State Road Transport Act, the Supreme Court, the High Court, AIR, the Supreme Court, Lordships, State, Commonwealth of Australia, Bank of New South Wales, the Supreme Court, State, the High Court, the Government of Bombay, the Agricultural Produce Markets Act, Sangli, Market Committee, Sangli, Government, the State Government, the High Court, ChiefJustice, the Supreme Court, AIR 1954 SC 728, the Supreme Court, State, State, the Supreme Court, State, State, Court, the Bombay High Court, State, State, Court, the High Court of Allahabad, the Supreme Court, State, the Privy Council, Lordships, State, Commonwealth, State, State, The Privy Council, AIR 1954 SC 728, the Supreme Court, State, State, AIR 1951, SC, the State of Madhya Pradesh, Berar Regulation of Manufacture of Bidis (, State, Sagor, the Supreme Court, Wide, Commodity, State, Madhya Bharat Cotton Association Ltd., Union of India, AIR 1954, the High Court, the State of Madhya Bharat, Parliament, Legislature of a State, Legislature, State

CARDINAL: 500/-, 2, 309, Two, 22, 1, 8, 16, 8, 16, 16, 47, 8, 16, 47, 7, 47, 1949.12, 7, 118, 47, two, two, one, one, 257, one, two, two, 323, one, 257, 257, 19, 287, two, 19(1)(g, 301, 20, 6, two, 755, 20, one, 26, one, intercourse.30, 755, one, 118, 35, two, 302, 303, 47, 7, 14, 47

GPE: States, the United States of Gwalior, oil.9, Chintamarao, Part XIII, States, India, U. P., Motilal, India, Bombay, Bapubhai, Bombay, Part XIII, India, Part XIII ', India, India, Part XIII, Madhya, Counsel, India, facts.32, force.39, India, India

PRODUCT: 2-11-1930, Article

ORDINAL: second, first, 15th

EVENT: the Australian Constitution, Para 33, Bombay 21

FAC: Articles 301

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //