Narayan Vs. State - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jul-28-1955

Court: Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 161, I.P.C., Section 4, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 161, I.P.C., Section 4, Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 4, Prevention of Corruption Act

ORG: Nevaskar, the 'Sar Panch, Department, Anti-Corruption Department, Court, Agarwal Radio Store, Court, Anti Corruption Department, Annobai, the Madhya Bharat Village ', Annobai, Annobai, Annobal, State, Magistrate, Annobai, the Privy Council, Annobai, Annobai, Annobai, Incident, D. W, Babulal, Annobai, Annobai, Annobai, Annobai, Annobai, Annobai, Annobai, Pannalal, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Lordships

NORP: J.1, Ra, D.

GPE: Narayan, Narayan, a Sar Panch, Bhichholi, temple.12, Fulchand, Babulal, Balvant, Pannalal

DATE: six months', the next day, 1956, 1949, 1936, about 5 and 6 months, 32

PERSON: Bs, Gram Panchayat', Lalman, Complainant Lalman, Lalman, Pawar, Pawar, Gandhi Hall, Upahargraha', Panna, Lalman, Ganesh Upa-hargraha, Lalman, Ex, Ken-dra Panchayat', Kendra Panchayat', Ex, accused.10, Gram Panchayat', Lalman, Malgava, Malgava, Malgava, Lalman, Acharya, Acharya, Nazir Ahmad v. Emperor', Complainant Lalman, Panchayat, Panchayat, Panchayat, Ex, Balvant, D. W. 4 Balvant, Panchayat, Lalman, Ex, Patel, P. W. 4 Balwant, Panchayat, Vindhya Pradesh'

CARDINAL: 100, 17-3-1952, 5, 7, five, five, one, One, five, five, five, five, five, one, five, one, one, 3-12, 1, five, one, 27, five, 8-4, five, 5, five, 5, 253, 2, 3-12, 2-8, 1, 5, 3-12, 3-3-1952, 5, 3-12, about 4 or, 3-12, 4, 5, 5, 3-12, 5, 3-12, 5, 7, 3-12, about 4 or, 5, 3-12, 5, 1954CriLJ910, 27, 334

ORDINAL: first, Firstly, Secondly, first, second, first

FAC: the Mal Godown Road

PRODUCT: Annobal Re, Gram, house.18, the 'Gram Panchayat'

WORK_OF_ART: Chandmal v. State'

TIME: the evening, half an hour later