Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Punam Chand Vs. State and anr.

Decided On : Nov-08-1951

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 103, the Cantonments Act, Section 103, the Cantonments Act, Section 103, the Cantonments Act, Section 103, the Cantonments Act, Section 103, chapter 5, the Cantonments Act, Section 61, Section 62, Section 63, Section 64, Section 65, Section 80, Section 103, Section 103, Section 103, the Cantonments Act, Chapter V of the Cantonments Act 'Octroi', Chapter V., Section 83, Section 81, Section 103, Section 81, Section 103, Section 82, Section 82, the Cantonments Act, Section 103, Section 103, Section 103

ORG: ORDERChaturvedi, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Modern Radio House, Radio, Naka, the Cantonment Board, the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mhow Cantonment, Cantonment, ascertaining:(a, the Cantonment Board, Octroi, Terminal, Toll, the Government Advocate, Radio, the Cantonment Board, Board, Board, Cantonment, Legislature, Board, Legislature, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate

NORP: J.1, French

ORDINAL: Second, first

CARDINAL: 2, 20/-, 53, 50, 1, one hundred, 81, 83, 66 to 74, 75 to 79, 81 to 83, 97, 105, ten, fifty, 3, 4, one

PERSON: Mhow, Octroi, above.4, Sanghi, Sanghi, Sanghi, Sanghi, Maharshi, Maharshi, Maharshi, Octroi, Mohamad Ibrahim v. Municipality, Anakapalli 16, Generalia Specialibus Non-Derogant.9, Mhow

DATE: the 19th November 1949, 10 days, the month of April 1949, 1924, annual, 1951, 1939, 82, annual, April 1949, 1924, one year, 1924, 81 to 83

GPE: Routes

PRODUCT: Cantonment, Octroi, Cantonment

LOC: Cantonment, Cantonment, Cantonment

FAC: Sections 84 to 88, Sections 89 to 96

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //