Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Punam Chand Vs. State and anr.
Decided On : Nov-08-1951
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Section 103, the Cantonments Act, Section 103, the Cantonments Act, Section 103, the Cantonments Act, Section 103, the Cantonments Act, Section 103, chapter 5, the Cantonments Act, Section 61, Section 62, Section 63, Section 64, Section 65, Section 80, Section 103, Section 103, Section 103, the Cantonments Act, Chapter V of the Cantonments Act 'Octroi', Chapter V., Section 83, Section 81, Section 103, Section 81, Section 103, Section 82, Section 82, the Cantonments Act, Section 103, Section 103, Section 103
ORG: ORDERChaturvedi, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Modern Radio House, Radio, Naka, the Cantonment Board, the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mhow Cantonment, Cantonment, ascertaining:(a, the Cantonment Board, Octroi, Terminal, Toll, the Government Advocate, Radio, the Cantonment Board, Board, Board, Cantonment, Legislature, Board, Legislature, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate
NORP: J.1, French
ORDINAL: Second, first
CARDINAL: 2, 20/-, 53, 50, 1, one hundred, 81, 83, 66 to 74, 75 to 79, 81 to 83, 97, 105, ten, fifty, 3, 4, one
PERSON: Mhow, Octroi, above.4, Sanghi, Sanghi, Sanghi, Sanghi, Maharshi, Maharshi, Maharshi, Octroi, Mohamad Ibrahim v. Municipality, Anakapalli 16, Generalia Specialibus Non-Derogant.9, Mhow
DATE: the 19th November 1949, 10 days, the month of April 1949, 1924, annual, 1951, 1939, 82, annual, April 1949, 1924, one year, 1924, 81 to 83
GPE: Routes
PRODUCT: Cantonment, Octroi, Cantonment
LOC: Cantonment, Cantonment, Cantonment
FAC: Sections 84 to 88, Sections 89 to 96