Prashant Kumar Vs. State of C.G. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Mar-24-2005

Court: Chhattisgarh

LAW: the Notaries Act, Section 5 of the Act, P-5, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5, Section 5:, the Advocates Act, Section 2(d, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5 of the Act, Act No. 36, Section 6 of the Act, Section 8, Section 9, Section 10, Section 10, Section 14, Section 15, Section 10 of the Act, Section 5(2, Section 10, Section 5(2, Article 162 of the Constitution of India, the Constitution Bench, Section 21, Section 21, the Constitution Bench, Rule 13, Section 8 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5(2, Section 8 of the Act, Rule 3, P-5

PERSON: L.C. Bhadoo, Notary, Chandra Prakash Sharma, Raipur Civil District, Kumar Thakur, Anil Kumar Tiwari, Krishna Beriwal, Sylvester Toppo, Madan Lal Gupta, Petitioner Rajkumar, Counsel, Schedule, A. Gourisankar v., A. Gourisankar, J.J. Lahiri v. State, Shri Rama, Mathew, Bhagwati, Counsel, Oxygen, Lord Reid, L. J. clearly, L. J.,, 4th Edn, para 33, Shri Rama, Lord Reid, A. Gourisankar, Chandra Prakash Sharma, Anr, Kumar Thakur, Madan Lal Guptareveals, Anil Kumar Tiwari

NORP: J.1, Rules, R., British, R., R., Rules

GPE: India, Notary, Kondagaon, Janjgir, India, Notary, the State of Kerala, The State of Kerala, Kerala, KLT, Kerala, Notary, Padfield, Rex v., L.J., Halsbury, L.J., Halsbury, Kerala, Notary

DATE: 31st December, 1952, 31st December, 2002, 3247/2003, 2.1.1989, two years, 1171/2003, the year 1993, 26.12.2002, 1600/ 2003, 10.11.1978, 17.10.2002, 10.1.2003, 1894/2003, the year 1985, 26.5.2003, 30.5.1992, the year 1985, 10.1.2003.4, 31st December, 2002, 1999, the year 1999, 3 years to 5 years, ten years, 31st December, 2002, ten years, 0065/1973, 3247/2003, 3247/2003, 1999, three years, five years, five years, three years, 1961, three years, five years, five years, five years, Annual, 1956, 10 years, seven years, at least ten years, six months, 1991, six years, six years, the age of 70 years, 0065/1973, 1961, three years, two years, 1968, 1918, 1919, 1970, 1966, 1919, 1919, '20, 0065/1973, the year 1992, 30.9.1994, 1999, 'three years', 'five years', three years to five years, five years, 31.12.2002, 31.12.2002, 10 years' period, ten years tenure.25, 10 years, more than ten years, 31st December, 2002, 31st December, 2002, 494/2003, 1894/2003, 624/2003, 1171/2003, the year 1993, 26.12.2002, 30th May, 1992, 29.5.2001, the month of May, 2001, 1600/2003, 22.7.1993, 31st December, 2002, ten years', 1171/2003, 510/2003, 1600/2003

ORG: the State of Chhattisgarh, State of Madhya Pradesh, the State Government, State, Notary Public, Notary Public, Notary Public, Notary Public, Notary Public, Notary Public, Notary Public, Dharam Raigarh, Notary Public, Notary Public, Court, the State Government, Learned Counsel, the State Government, Notary Public, Notary Public, State, Advocate General, Central, the Central Government, the State Government, Notary Public, Notary Public, Notary Public, The State Government, Notary Public, the Apex Court, Shri Rama Sugar Industries Ltd., State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors, Advocate General, Advocate General, W.P. No, State, Government, the Central Government, State Government, State, Register, Government, the 'Functions, Register, Court, Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, the Indian Legal Service, Judicial Service, the Central Government, State Government, Bar Council, Bar Association, State, Notary Public, Notary Public, Kerala High Court, State, The State Government, State, the State Government, Legislature, Government, Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the State Government, the State Government, the Apex Court, the Andhra Pradesh Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase, Government, The State Government, the High Court, The High Court, the Apex Court, Legislature, the State of Andhra Pradesh, Government, The Apex Court, S.A. de Smith's, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, The Apex Court, Court, the State of Andhra Pradesh, Act.18, the Apex Court, London County Council, the London County Council, The Apex Court, London Authority, The Apex Court, the House of Lords, the Industrial Development Act, the Board of Trade, Board, Board, London Authority, Bankes, Emphasis, London Authority, Board, Board, The Board, Bankes, Board, The Apex Court, Emphasis, the Apex Court, Government, Court, Act, Bankes, Notary Public, the Kerala High Court, the Kerala High Court, Kerala High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Notary Public, Notary Public, Government, Calcutta High Courts, Government, Notary Public, Government, the Government of Chhattisgarh, Government, Government, the Central Government, Notary Public, Legislature, Government, Notary Public, Notary Public, Government, Notary Public, State, Government, Legislature, the State of Chhattisgarh, Notary Public, Notary Public, S.A. de Smith's, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, Legislature, Bar, the High Court, Notary Public, Bar Council, Bar Association, Notary Public, the Office of a Notary Public, Notary Public, the State Government, Government, Government, Government, Notary Public, Notary Public, Notary Public, State, Notary Public, Notary Public, The State Government

CARDINAL: 1.1.2001, 8.8.2002, 21.7.2002, 23.12.2002, 2, 36, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1974]2SCR787, 31.12.2002, 5.8, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1999.11, 4, 6, 6, 7, 3, 8, 4-A, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 13, 2, 552, two, 1974]2SCR787, 3, 3, two, 1, 1, 1, 184, two, 19, 3, 165, 1, 184, 1, 184, less than 25, 1, 35, 1974]2SCR787, 36, 2, 31.12.2002, 510/2003, 23.12.2002, 21.7.2002, 26.12.2002, three, three

LOC: this Writ Petition, Single, Single, W.P. Nos

WORK_OF_ART: 2nd Edition