Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ranganayaki Vs. The State

Decided On : Feb-27-2015

Court : Chennai

LAW: Honourable, Section 34, Section 34, the Development Agreement, the Development Agreement, The Supplementary Agreement, the Development Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, Section 11, Section 9, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Development Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Development Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Development Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Development Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, Section 34, a Development Agreement, Section 11(3, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, Section 67, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 67, the Evidence Act, Section 101, Section 102, Section 34, Section 34, Section 73, the Contract Act, Section 74, Section 73, Section 34, section 68, the English Arbitration Act, Section 34, Section 34, Madras 422, Section 19, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Evidence Act, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 34, the Evidence Act, Section 1, the Indian Evidence Act, the Supplementary Agreement, Section 34 of the Act, Section 23, the Indian Contract Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 23, the Indian Contract Act, Section 34 of the Act, Section 34, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 31(3, Section 34, section 75 or section 81."38, Section 34(2, section 34(2, section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34 of the Act, Section 34, Section 73, the Contract Act, Section 34, Section 34 of the Act, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34

PERSON: JUDICATURE, P.JYOTHIMANI, Aruna Parwal No.7, Lane Gole Market, Ravishankar Prasad 601, Chennai , Ravishankar Prasad 601, Sri, Chennai , Malini Ganesh, T.V.Ramanujun, Y.N.Venkatraj ORDER, Rs.1,44,11,070/-, Rs.1,44,11,070/-, Malini Ganesh, Vedathanni, Narayanan, Hansraj Gupta, Dehra Dun-Mussoorie Electric, Gururao Puttanbhat, Kadekar, Padmavathi Gururao Kadekar, Gordhandas Seksaria, Shri Krishan v., Vijay Packaging, R.Thiagarajan v., Madras, T.V.Ramanujun, Sarkar Enterprises v. M/s.Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd., Larsen, Gurdeep Kaur, Anil Rishi, Gurbaksh Singh, Rs.1,44,11,070/-, Supplementary Agreement, and/or lien, payable.13, C3, Supplementary Agreement, Palaniappan Ramasamy, Palaniappan Ramasamy, K.Mohamad Ali, Palaniappan Ramasamy, v. N. Swaminathan, LW147, Anil Rishi, Gurbaksh Singh, Nani Palkhivala, B.P. Saraf, Gurdeep Kaur, Hind Builders v. Union, Bijendra Nath Srivastava v. Mayank Srivastava, Anr, Refer, Hind Builders Vs, Bijendra Nath Srivastava Vs, Mayank Srivastava, Others, Ranganayaki Ammal, Ponnusami Chettiar, Kailasam Chettiar, Fauja Singh, Shri Krishan v., R.Thiagarajan v., Madras, Thawardas Pherumal, Gururao Puttanbhat, Kadekar, Padmavathi Gururao Kadekar, Indian Law, LR5(SC, Rajasthan, Basant Nahata, judgment/, Renusagar, Singla, Singla, J., Sarkar Enterprises v. M/s.Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd., Harishchandra, AIR1962SC366 1962, Harishchandra Dwarakadas

CARDINAL: 7, 001, 600, 600 006.3, No.9, 600 028, 1, 1, 2, 10, 2.2, 1,87,180, 1, 2, up to third, 17.3.1988, 2.3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 35,450, 29, 2.4, 29, 35,450, 1, 2, 29, 1, 2, 29, 2.5, 1, 2, 23.5.1992, 2.6, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2.7, 1, 2, 24.12.1997, 567, 1, 2, 29, 2.8, 1, 2, 2.9, two, two, three, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 29, 35,450, 1, 2, 1, 2, 31, 1, 2, 29, 1, 2, 5.1, 1, 2, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 2, 28, 330, 3, 6.1, 6.2, one, 6.3, 1, 1, 3, 65, 5, 2, 3, 415, 1, 4, 4, 4, 2, 314, 255, 128, 1, 1, 2, 13, 18.03, 7, 597, 1, 2, three, 1, 2, 1,87,180, 1, 2, 1, 2.10, two, 28.4.1989, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 29, 35,450, 1, 2, 29, 35,450, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, two, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, two, C2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 28.4.1989, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, more than one, 1, 4, 5, three, 17.3.1988, 24, 1, 2, 3, 4, 27, 4, two, two, 1, 2, 28, 612, 722.30, 1, 2, 3, 2, 4, 3, 7, 3, 11, 12, one, 330, 2, 1 SCC6441994, 2, three, 5, 2, 3, three, 12, 1, 64, 1, 2, 35, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 65, 5, 2, 7, 1, 1, 415, 8, One, more than one, 2, 7.8.2009, 7.8.2009

DATE: 2007, 2009, 1996, 1996, 3.2.2007, 17.3.1988, 17.3.1988, 25.7.1990, 25.7.1990, 13.6.1991, 29.6.1992, 1.8.1992, 26.10.1995, 19.5.1997, 17.6.2006, 12.9.2006, 3.2.2007, 17.3.1988, 25.7.1990, 13.6.1991, 12.9.2006, 25.7.1990, 17.3.1988, 13.6.1991, 15 days, 2006, 37) 1950, 2008, 2000, 2006, 2000, 2002, 2009, 2008, 2008, 2008, 2008, 2006, 2009, 16.11.1987, 25.7.1990, 17.3.1988, 25.7.1990, 17.3.1988, 25.7.1990, 25.7.1990, 16.11.1987, nearly sixteen months, 25.7.1990, 25.7.1990, 13.6.1991, 23.5.1992, 17.3.1988, 29.6.1992, 25.7.1990, 13.6.1991, 25.7.1990, 17.3.1988, 25.7.1990, 17.3.1988, 17.3.1988, 1872, 2008, 2003, 2006, the beginning or later, 1996, 2008, 25.7.1990, 34) 1947, 1908, 1872, four months, May 1973, 1872, 17.3.1988, 25.7.1990, 2006, 61, 1994, 2003, 1986, 2005, 1994, 1996, 1996, 2000, 1996, 2000, 1996, the days, 1948, 2009, 2007

FAC: Proprietrix, 30.6.1991, the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.

ORG: M/s.Gemini Arts Private Ltd. rep, Madha Church Road Mandavelipakkam, Respondents Petition, Arbitrator, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Companies, The City Centre Point, Chennai, FSI, The Development Agreement, MMDA, Development Agreement, the Indian Bank, Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitrator, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Board of Directors, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Indian Bank, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, MMDA, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supplementary Agreement, the Arbitral Tribunal, SAW Pipes Limited, McDermott International Inc., Burn Standard Co. Ltd., AIR1940PC98, the Maharaja of Gondal, AIR, Kurukshetra University, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supplementary Agreement, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Kishore, Ircon International Limited v., Arvind Construction Company Limited, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Albert & Co., The Superintending Engineer, PWD, Union of India v. M/s.India Proofing, General Industries, India Tourism and Development Corporation Ltd., T.P.Sharma, Kanha Credit & Housing Pvt. Ltd., Janacim Electronics, Toubro, Puri Construction Limited, Panilpina World Transport, National Highways Authority of India, Delhi Development Authority, Anand and Associates, xiv) Government of NCT, Gmbh v. Steel Authority of India, Associates, Delhi Development Authority, Alankit Assignments Ltd., FSI, FSI, the Arbitral Tribunal, Government, the Hon'ble Supreme Court.11, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, MMDA, MMDA, the Development Agreement, MMDA, the Arbitral Tribunal, MMDA, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral, the Development Agreement, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Government, MMDA, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Government, the Development Control Rules, Housing and Urban Development, MMDA, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government Orders, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Board of Directors, The Arbitral Tribunal, Palaniappan Ramasamy, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the State Government Order, the Management of the Company.20, Development Agreement, Palaniappan Ramasamy, the Development Agreement, Ramasamy, Palaniappan Ramasamy, Development Agreement, Ramasamy, Court, Kishore, xerox, Xerox, Xerox, The Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Ltd., Chengai Transport Branch, Branch, Ors, xerox, xerox, xerox, xerox, the Supreme Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supreme Court, OWNER, The Supreme Court, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited, SAW Pipes Limited, that:-, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Jurist & Senior Advocate, Justice, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the State Government, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, the High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, The Supreme Court, M/s Sudarsan Trading Co., Court, Court, Union of India, the Supreme Court, Court, AIR, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Kurukshetra University, the Supreme Court, University, the Department of Law, University, the Head of Department, University, University, the Supreme Court, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Examination, University, University, Vijay Packaging, the Division Bench, Bench, the Apex Court, another v. Union of India, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supplementary Agreement, Development Agreement, the Karnataka High Court, Govinda Naik Gurunath Naik, the Division Bench, McDermott International Inc., Burn Standard Co. Ltd., Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Renusagar Power Co. Ltd., General Electric Co., Court, Court, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., Saw Pipes Ltd., Court, Court, Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd., Brojo Nath Ganguly, Court, ONGC, Court, ONGC, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Tribunal, Court, J.in Ircon International Limited v., Arvind Construction Company Limited, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Financial, the Railway Board, Arbitrator, Court, Court, award.-, Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Albert & Co., the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, the Bombay High Court, Union of India v. M/s.India Proofing, General Industries, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Kanha Credit & Housing Pvt. Ltd., Janacim Electronics, Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Development Control Rules, the Supreme Court, Court, the English Court, Courts, Fortress Fabrics Ltd., Arbitrators, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Original Petition

LOC: Mount Road, Mount Road, form.15

PERCENT: 6%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 6%, 50%, 50%, the remaining 50%, 24%, 50%

ORDINAL: third, tenth, third, tenth, fourth, tenth, tenth, third, third, tenth, tenth, third, tenth, tenth, tenth, third, first, tenth, tenth, third, first, tenth, tenth, tenth, third, tenth, first, second, tenth, third, tenth, tenth, first, second, tenth, first, second, second, tenth, second, first, First, tenth

MONEY: 30.6.1991

EVENT: the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, Sections 28, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement, the Supplementary Agreement

GPE: O.A.Nos.566, Rangoon, L.Rs, Bhadran, Salem, Kanpur, Delhi, Khem Chand, Mylapore, Bhadran, India, India, Justice S.M.Jhunjhunuwala, India, Ramachandra Ayyar, L.Rs, India, India, Renusagar, India, India, India, India, India, Kanpur, India

PRODUCT: Rs.40,00,000/-, Rs.40,00,000/-, Suppl, ER186

NORP: Hindu, Indian, "29, Indian, Indian, S.K.Mahajan, Southern African

WORK_OF_ART: Spectra Packs Pvt. Ltd., Shri Sumerji, Spectra Packs Pvt. Ltd., Mediterraneam and Eastern Export Co. Ltd.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //