Lucas T Vs. Ltd. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jan-30-1989

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Rule 10, Section 4

CARDINAL: 1, 71/78, 4,96,760.20, 82, 5.7.1982, 1,04,297.35, 5, 21,222.10, 29, 26, 611, 8, 353, 291, 18

ORG: the Government of India, Tribunal, the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, GPI, inter alia, S.D.R., Department, Cheran En, Corporation, Coimbatore, ELT, the Central Excise Duty, Case Law:1.1986, Secals Ltd., C.C.E., Madras.2.1983, Departmental Representative, Depart, the Concise Oxford Dictionary, the Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary, the High Court, Tariff, Clause 47, Lallubhai Aminchand v., Tri

PERSON: Madras, Shri Vardarajan, Bill, GPII

PRODUCT: Central Excise, Rule 10

FAC: the Gate passes.2

DATE: 1944, the year 1978-79.3, six months, five years, 1986, 1982, the period of

GPE: Proviso, Bombay

NORP: Rules, informa

WORK_OF_ART: Suppress and Suppression, Collector of Central Excise