Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Decided On : May-22-2003

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Rule 27, the Lucknow Bench, the Lucknow Bench, Rule 27, Rule 27, the Lucknow Bench, the Lucknow Bench, Rule 27, Rule 27 proviso.9, the Lucknow Bench, Rule 27 of the Rule of 1963, Rule 27, Rule 23, Rule 27, Rule 27 of the Rule of 1963, the Rule 27 of the Rules of, the Rule 27, Rule 27, Rule 72, Rule 27

PERSON: Vineet Saran, Sri W.H. Khan, Sri Somesh Khare, Sri Arvind, Kumar Srivastava, Khan, Khan, Khan, Khan, Sri W.H. Khan, Kumar Singh v. State, Nos, Tehsil Banda, Khan, Kumar Singh, Kumar Singh, Kumar Singh, Khan, Bhalla, P.K. Chaterji, Khan, Ram Prakash Gupta, Bhu Tatva, Evam Khaikaram, RamPrakash Gupta, Khan, the Gaon Sabha, Khan, Khan, Khan, Khan, Khan, Khan, Khan, Khan, Khan, Prem Nath Sharma v., Prem Nath Sharma, Khan, Khan, Khan, Instant, Netai Bag v. State, Khan, Khan, Khan, Aman Singh, Raj Kishore Singh, Ghanshyam Singh, Khan, Ghanshyam Singh, Raj Kishore Singh, Khan, Banda, Clerk, Banda, Jitendra Singh Writ, Nos, Nos, Ghanshyam Singh, Raj Ashore Singh, Civil Misc, Vijay Bhadur v. State, Khan, Khan, Nos, Nos

NORP: J.1, Rules, Rules

CARDINAL: 10-4-2003, 1, 2, 4, 9.3, two, one, 1, one, 1, 761, 2003.8, two, three, three, three, 27-12-2002, 30-12-2002;(ii, 1, 2, 23-12-2002, 2, 7601, 2-11, 21-11, 30-12-2002.(iii, 3, 233, 2-11-2002, 30-12-2002, 4, 6, 7, 4, three, 11, five, three, 9, 1 Firm, three, three, 1, 1, 30-12-2002, 27, 30-12-2002, one, 1, One, two, 2-11-2002, 28-11-2002, two, three, 23-12-2002, 30-12-2002, 54048, two thousand, two, 27(a, 27(a, 27(a, one, 5, four, 27(a, 27, 4, 552, 113, 1160.19, 9(1, 27, 27, 2002.20, 27, 27, one, two, One, 3, 7, 645, 8, 262, 2, 1, 14, 27-12-2002, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 2, two, 25,000, 7, 19-12-2002, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, one, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 1, 6, 7, 5, Six, twelve, more than three, 2, 16, 50, 6, one half, 16, 2-11-2002, 4, 2, 7 to 9, 28, 8, 27, 7, 9, 5,000/-

ORG: the S.C. Misra, Advocate General, State, Sri Rakesh Dwivedi, Sri Milan Banerjee, State, Court, Court, Court, Registry, U.P., U.P., the Notice Board, the Hon'ble Court, U.P., State, Government, Naraini, Attarra, the Hon'ble Court, Lucknow Bench, Court, Firm, M.B., Court, Bench, Court, the District Magistrate, Court, Court, Standing Counsel, the Lucknow Bench, the Lucknow Bench, Court, Court, U.P. Lucknow, U.P. Lucknow, Committee, the State Government under Rule 71, the Notice Board, the State Government, Committee, Committee, Committee, the State Government under Rule 71, the State Government, U.P., AIR 1997 SC 2252, Bhiktsi Jaipuria v. Union of India, SC, Rubber House v. Excellsior Neele Industries Pvt. Ltd., AIR 1969, SC, the Supreme Court, Court, The Apex Court, U.P., AIR 2001, Graphite India Ltd., Durgapur Projects Ltd., AIR 1999, AIR 2000 SC, the Apex Court, Court, Brijesh Kumar, Maiya Deen Shyam, Court, Nazir, State, the Prevention of Gangsters Act, Uttar Pradesh, State of Madhya Pradesh, Division Bench, U.P., the State Government, State, State, Lacs, Banda District, Court, The State Government, Government, State, Court, Court, Registry, Court, Court, Rupees Five Thousand

DATE: 5, 6, 8, 21-11-2002, 30th December, 2002, 1963, 1963, 21st Nov. 2002, 30th Dec. 2002, 27th Dec. 2002, 27th Dec. 2002, winter, 27th Dec. 2002, 2002, 30th Dec. 2002, 3rd January, 2003, 6th January, at least 30 days, 23-12-2002, 2002, at least 30 days, 2003, 21-11-2002, 5, Rule 27, 1963, 7601, 2002, 21-11-2002, 23rd Dec. 2002, today, 21-11-2002, 30-12-2002, today, a period of, two weeks, Three days, today, 30th Dec. 2002, 23rd Dec. 2002, 30th Dec. 2002, 30 days, thirty days', 2002, 23rd Dec. 2002, 30th Dec. 2002, 1963, '27, at least thirty days, at least seven days, 1963, at least thirty days, at least thirty days, 23rd Dec. 2002, 30th Dec. 2002, 1963, 7 days, 1963, between 23rd Dec. 2002, 30th Dec. 2002 seven clear days, 30th Dec. 2002, 1963, seven days, 1963, 30th Dec. 2002, thirty days, 1963, Dec. 2002, 30th Dec. 2002, thirty days, 1963, 30th Dec. 2002, 21 Nov. 2002, 7th Dec. 2002, daily, 22nd Nov. 2002, Dec. 2002, 22nd Nov. 2002, 22nd Nov. 2002, 30th Dec. 2002, more than thirty days, 22nd Nov. 2002, the period of, thirty days, Dec. 2Q02, 1963, Dec. 2002, 22nd Nov. 2002, 1963, seven days, seven days, 1997, 1962, earlier than thirty days, 1963, the period of seven days, 1963, 30th Dec. 2002, 30th Dec. 2002, 21st Nov. 2002, 23rd Dec. 2002, 30th Dec. 2002, 1963, 23rd Dec. 2002, 23rd Dec. 2002, 23rd Dec. 2002, 30th Dec. 2002, 1963, 1963, at least seven days, 2001, 1203, 1999, 2000, 3313, Dec. 30, 2002, 21st Nov. 2002, 30-12-2002, 23-12-2002, 20th Dec. 2002, 20th Dec. 2002, 18th Dec. 2002, Dec. 2002.23, 14th Dec. 2002, 18th Dec. 2002.24, 23rd Dec. 2002, 21st Nov. 2002, 7, 8, 21-11-2002, '28, 30th Dec. 2002, 6th January, 2003, 28th January, 2003, 29th January, 2003, 30th Dec. 2002

FAC: Sri Vikram Nath, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow Bench

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, second, first, second, second, first, First, Secondly, second, first, Thirdly, 7th, first, 7th, 7th, 7th, 30th, 30th, third, first, 20th

GPE: Singh v. State, Singh v. State, Court;(v, Brijesh, Brijesh, us, Jurisdiction, Singh

TIME: 15 minutes, 28-11-2002, 15 minutes

WORK_OF_ART: Singh 7

MONEY: 25 per cent

LOC: Sadar

PRODUCT: Tahsils

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //