Skip to content

Ram Dhyan Singh Vs. State - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided On : Jan-13-1953

Court : Allahabad

LAW:

Section 161, I.P.C., the Tehsildar of Domariaganj, Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 161 or Section 165, the Indian Penal Code, Section 5 of this Act

DATE:

one year's, the end of 1947, 40/-, 40/-, June 30, 1949, 1949, 1947

CARDINAL:

200/-, 2, 31-3-1948, 25/-, one, 75/-, 3-1-1948, two, two, one, 26, 31-3-1948, 26, 31-3-1948, 30-4-1948, 23, 23, 31-3-1948, 26, 31-3-1948, 2, only two, 177

ORG:

the Supply Department, the District Magistrate, Tehsildar, Tehsildar, Tehsildar, Tehsildar, Court, Magistrate, the Central Government, Central Government, Court, Court, Government, Court, Legislature, Government, Prosad, Chandra v. Emperor's, Naraindas, AIR 1932, AIR 1937 Nag 293, Court, the Supreme Court

TIME:

about noon

PERSON:

Ram Dhayan Singh, Suraj Narain, S. Y. Patil', Nagpur, M.P. v. Hifzul Rahman AIR 1952, F).6

LOC:

the District Magistrate.4

GPE:

Suganchand

NORP:

theCalcutta

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //