Skip to content

Lajja Ram Vs. the State - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jul-22-1955

Court: Allahabad

LAW: Section 302, Section 302

PERSON: Chowdhry, Jagannathpur, I. P. C., Pragu, Lajjaram, Ramdas, Jagannathpur, Pragu, Pragu, Pragu, Pragu, Pragu, Lareti, Pragu, Chabutra, Moti Lal, Ram Sanehi, Gajadhar, Gajadhar, Ram Sanehi, Ram Singh, Pragu, Pragu, Ram Das, Lajjaram, Pragu, Pragu, Jamuna Nath, Pragu, Pragu, S. P. Saxena, Ram Das, Lajja Ram, Pragu, Moti Lal, Ram Sanehi, Chhiddu, Moti Lal, e. g., Shakoor v. State', Asthana J., Sajjan Singh v. Emperor', Ghulam Mohiuddin', Bhargava J., Moti Lal, Moti, Mst, Lareti, Mst, Lareti, Lareti, Lareti, Pragu, Pragu, the F. I. R. version, Lareti, Sri K.B. Srivastava, I. P. C.

DATE: 26, 1951, 16-7-1954, 28-8-1954, 2-9-1954, 10 days, 1955, 55, 1951

ORG: P.S. Ajitmal, District Etawah, Kakraiya, Additional Sessions, Kakraiya, Chiddu, Chiddu, Rati, Har Prasad, Ajitmal, Kakraiya, Chiddu, the District Magistrate, Identification, The District Magistrate, PublicProsecutor, Magistrate, Har Prasad, Identification, Magistrate, Court, AIR, Court, State, Court, Magistrate, Rati, Bilaso, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate

CARDINAL: Three, 2, 8-3-1954, three, one, two, One, about 10, 3., one, 4., seven, two, 10-3-1954, two, 5, 30-4, 3, 23-8-1954for, 26-8-1954, 23-8-1954, 6., one, three, 8., six, three, three, 9, 1945, two, 11-6-1954, 31, 24-8-1954, one, three, 1, three, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, three, three, three, 13, 14, 15

GPE: Kanhai, Lakhan, Khaki, Kanhai, Lakhan, Kanhai, Lakhan, Gajadhar, Ghhiddu, Chhiddu, Chhiddu, Chhiddu

TIME: about half an hour, 9 p.m., an hour, noon

QUANTITY: 5 miles

ORDINAL: Second

NORP: Sessions, Msts

WORK_OF_ART: Chhiddu, Mst

LOC: Mst

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //