Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Prem Chand Vs. Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Agra and Others
Decided On : Feb-13-2001
Court : Allahabad
LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2, Section 30, Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, Section 30, Section 23, the Civil Procedure Code, the Code of Civil Procedure applicable, Section 23, Rule 41, Rule 32, Rule 32, Section 4 of the Act, Section 22, Section 23, Section 30, Section 5, Indian Limitation Act, Section 32, Section 32, Section 32, Section 32 of the Act, Rule 25, Rule 26, Rule 24, Rule 28, Rule 41, Rule 26, Rule 26, Section 23 of the Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order V. Section 23, Section 23 of the Act, Section 32, Section 30, Section 5, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 5, the Indian Limitation Act
CARDINAL: 1.2.2001, 3, 41, 3, 6.3.1999, 200, 2, 2, 24, 24, 25, 26, 33, 41, 41, 24 or 25, 41, 41, 6.3.1999
ORG: the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Court, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Order IX, Court, Tehsildar, The Workmen Compensation Commissioner, the State Government, the State Government, theCommissioner, Order IX, Civil Procedure, theCommissioner, Order IX, theRules, the Workmen Compensation, Judicial Tribunal, Tribunal, State, Act.10, the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, the Workmen Compensation, Court, the Workmen Compensation Commissioner
DATE: 6th March, 1999, 1923, May. 1999, 11th August, 2000, sixty days, 1924, 25, underRule 27, May. 1999, 3rd May. 1999, thirty days, four months
WORK_OF_ART: The Workmen Compensation
PERSON: Kosi Kalan, Mathura, Agra, Mathura, Commissionerto, Agra, Agra, Mathura
EVENT: Workmen's Compensation Act
PERCENT: 12%
ORDINAL: 3rd, 3rd
GPE: Agra Region
FAC: Notice