Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Prem Chand Vs. Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Agra and Others

Decided On : Feb-13-2001

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2, Section 30, Section 5 of Indian Limitation Act, Section 30, Section 23, the Civil Procedure Code, the Code of Civil Procedure applicable, Section 23, Rule 41, Rule 32, Rule 32, Section 4 of the Act, Section 22, Section 23, Section 30, Section 5, Indian Limitation Act, Section 32, Section 32, Section 32, Section 32 of the Act, Rule 25, Rule 26, Rule 24, Rule 28, Rule 41, Rule 26, Rule 26, Section 23 of the Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order V. Section 23, Section 23 of the Act, Section 32, Section 30, Section 5, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 5, the Indian Limitation Act

CARDINAL: 1.2.2001, 3, 41, 3, 6.3.1999, 200, 2, 2, 24, 24, 25, 26, 33, 41, 41, 24 or 25, 41, 41, 6.3.1999

ORG: the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, Court, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Order IX, Court, Tehsildar, The Workmen Compensation Commissioner, the State Government, the State Government, theCommissioner, Order IX, Civil Procedure, theCommissioner, Order IX, theRules, the Workmen Compensation, Judicial Tribunal, Tribunal, State, Act.10, the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, the Workmen Compensation, Court, the Workmen Compensation Commissioner

DATE: 6th March, 1999, 1923, May. 1999, 11th August, 2000, sixty days, 1924, 25, underRule 27, May. 1999, 3rd May. 1999, thirty days, four months

WORK_OF_ART: The Workmen Compensation

PERSON: Kosi Kalan, Mathura, Agra, Mathura, Commissionerto, Agra, Agra, Mathura

EVENT: Workmen's Compensation Act

PERCENT: 12%

ORDINAL: 3rd, 3rd

GPE: Agra Region

FAC: Notice

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //