Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ashok Kumar and Others Vs. Kameshwar Nath and Others

Decided On : Oct-27-1998

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Second Appeal, Section 8, the Hindu Law, Section 8, the Full Bench, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8(2, Section 8, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8(2, Section 8(2, Section 11, Section 8, Section 8(2, Section 8(2, Section 6, Section 6, Section 8, Section 8, Hindu Law, Section 8, Guj 68, Section 8, Section 8, Hindu Law, Section 8, Section 29, Section 8, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8, Section 8, Section 2, Section 6, Section 12, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 29, Section 8, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8(2, Section 8 of the Act, Section 206D of the U. P. Tenancy Act, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8, Section 8(2, Section 8(2

ORG: O.P. Garg, Suit No, Smt, Santosh Kumar, Smt, the Joint Hindu Family, Nainital, Smt, U. P. Zamindari Abolition, Court, Joint, the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, the Joint Hindu Family, Smt, Smt, Smt, Court, High Courts, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Ghansham Das v. Dr. Shiv Shankar Das, Amirthan v. Kudumbah, AIR 1991, Court, visceribus, Court, Legislature, Statute, Judicial, Sections 4, Court, Smt., Chandrawati Agarwal, AIR 1978 All, Court, the Bombay High Court, ILR, the Hindu Minorityand Guardianship Act, Joint, Court, the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, Karta, Court, Karta, Court, Karta, Karta, the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, Karta, Court, Karta, Court, Guardians, Karta, The Orissa High Court, AIR 1974, Court, Smt, AIR 1969 MP, AIR 1994 Bom 152, Guardians, the Bombay High Court, Guardians, Sections 6 and 12 of the Act, the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, necessary.18, Smt

NORP: J.1, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindus, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

CARDINAL: 290, 1, 3, 1, 2, 4, 2, 4, 5, 3, 4, 5, 906, 4, 5, 8.2.1966, 4., one, 1, 3, 8.2.1966, 4, 3, 1, 8.2.1966, 4.000, 22.2.1966, 5, 4, 5, 1 to 3, 8.2.1966, 4, 5, 1 to 3, 3, 4, 3, 1, 2, 1968, 1, 2, 4.9, 8.2.1966, 29.10,1966, 8.2.1966, 130, 8, 1, 2, 1, 2, 12, four, one, 12, 221, 184, half, 12, half, 3, 8.2.1966, 4, 14.8.1997, 5, 4, 5

DATE: 1997, 24.8.1967, 16.8.1975, 1975, 24.8.1967, the year, 1963, 24.8.1967, January, 1970, 12.1.1970, 17.1.1970, the year, 1966, more than 8 months, 1980, 1982, 1256, five years, more than one year, 6, 1974 1113, 1972, 32, 1890, '17, the year., 1966, 12.1.1970, 1939

PERSON: Shanti Devi-defendant, Radhey Shyam, Nos, Kameshwar Nath-defendant, Kameshwar Nath, Rajesh Kumar, Nos, Nos, Tahsil Kashipur, Udham Singh Nagar).2, Nos, Court, Basant Ram, Nos, Shanti Devi, Basant Ram, Nos, Kameshwar Nath, Shanti Devi, Nos, Nos, Nos, Shanti Devi, Shanti Devi-defendant, Nos, Jata Shankar, Nos, Heard Sri .G., N. Verma, Sri B. Dayal, Karneshwar Nath, Shanti Devi, Shanti Devi, Karneshwar Nath, Shanti Devi, Sri G. N. Verma, Sursati Devi v. Joint, Court-, Joint, Sakharam Shekhu v., Shiva Deorao, Law, Joint Hindu, Law, Krishna Kant v. Magan Lal, Joint, Subramaniam v. K. Gounder, Law, Sunamani Dei v., Babaji Das, Anad Singh, AIR 1982 Raj, Sunamani Dei, Hira Lal, Sugga Bai's, Gilankar LJ, Udaykumar Kashinath Kaushik, Hindu Law, U. P. Z., L. R. Act, L. R. Act, Law, Sursati Devi's, Shanti Devi, Hindu Law, Kamleshwar Nath-defendant, Rajesh Kumar, Kamleshwar Nath, Kamleshwar Nath, Rajesh Kumar, Nos

QUANTITY: 0.533 acres

PRODUCT: Bhumidhars, Rajesh, Bai, Rajesh

LOC: the District Judge, the District Judge.10

GPE: Bhumidhari, Ram Awlamb, Basti, Karta, Girdhan, Singh, Smt, Narayan, Smt

ORDINAL: first, first, first, Second, first, first, Second

FAC: The Girdhan Singh's

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //