Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ram Chandra Pathak Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Decided On : Feb-05-2003

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Regulations 350, Article 350 of the Civil Services Regulation, Section 3 of the U. P. State Road Transport Corporation Act, Article 43 of Civil Service Regulations, Section 45, Section 45, the Minimum Wages Act, the Factories Act, Section 45, Constitution Bench, Article 14 ofthe Constitution of India

PERSON: Sunil Ambwani, Sri V.K. Bunnan, Sri I.R. Singh, Sri R.K. Ojha, Sri Ranjeet Saxena, Sri Sameer Sharma, Kanpur, Kanpur andthe Headquarter, XXX-219/50, Misc, Governmentimmediately, lieu thereof, Lucknow, Bux Pathak v. U. P. State, Foreman, Foreman, Rajasthan Pensioners Samaj, V.K. Rama Murthy v. Union, Bux Pathak v. State, Har Bux Pathak, Har Bux Pathak, Sri I.R. Singh, Sri Sameer Sharma, Bux Pathak, Sri Sameer Sharma, R. Veerasamy, Prem Shanker Mishra v. State of U. P., Kanpur, Driver, Stateof Rajasthan v. Rajasthan PensionersSamaj, Jodhpur C.P.F.

ORG: U. P. State Road Transport Corporation, Court, Sri K.C. Shukla, The State Government, U. P. Government Roadways, Government, Government, the Civil Service Regulation, U. P. Regulation, the State Government, Kha)Vibhag Government, Governments, Contributory Provident Fund, U. P. Contributory Provident and Fund-Pension-Fund Insurance Rules, the Roadways Department, the Roadways Organisation, GeneralManager, GeneralManager, ServiceManager, ChiefMechanical Engineer, TransportCommissioner, the Employees Provident Fund Act, the Employees Provident Funds Act, Employees Provident Fund, Roadways Organisation, Employees Provident Fund, U. P. State Road Transport Corporation, Officers/Employees, the State Roadways Organisation, Roadways of the Transport Commissioner, Head Office, Government, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the Transport Organisation, Government, the Corporation under Clause, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Government, Invitation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, U. P. Road Transport Corporation, Corporation, the U. P. Transport Corporation Act, Corporation, Government, Corporation, U. P. State Road Transport Corporation Employees, the Road Transport Corporation Act, the State Government, the State Government, the U. P. Government Roadways Department, Corporation, the State Government, U. P. Government Roadways Department, Corporation, Corporation, the State Government, the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, the Payment of Wages Act, Corporation, the State Government, U. P. Government Roadways, Corporation, StateGovernment, RoadwaysDepartment, the General Provident Fund, the Payment of Gratuity Act, Government Rules, Group Insurance Scheme, State, Corporation, Corporation, the State Public Service Tribunal, Tribunal, Corporation, Corporation, Employees Provident Fund, the Employees Provident Fund, the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme, Employees Provident Fund Act, State, Supp, Krishna Kumar v. Union of India, All India Reserve Bank, Anr. v. Union of India, Supp, Tribunal, Employees Provident Fund, Contributory Fund, Court, Government, Government, the Employees Provident Fund Scheme, Government, the Employees Provident Fund Scheme, the Employees Provident Fund Act, C.P.F., the Employees Provident Fund, Court, Court, 31.5.1994, State Government, the State Government Roadways, State Government, U. P. Government Roadways, Corporation, Corporation, the U. P. Transport Corporation Act, Corporation, Corporation, Government Employees, Government, State Employees, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, U. P. Government Roadways Organisation (Abolition of Posts and Absorption of Employees, Corporation, Employees Provident Fund Scheme, Corporation, Government, Court, Corporation, Court, the State Government, Apex Court, T. N. Electricity Board, the T. N. Electricity Board, the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme, Board, Court, the Division Bench, Government, the U. P. Transport Corporation Employees, the State Road Organisation, Corporation, Government, the Service Regulation of, Corporation, Government, Transport, Head Office, Government, Government, Corporation, Corporation, the U. P. State Road Transport Corporation Employees, Corporation, Corporation, the Employees of Roadways, Government, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Government, Corporation, Corporation, Service Regulation, the Corporation under Regulation 4, the Service Regulations, Court, the U. P. Government Roadways, Corporation, Courtheld, the State Government, Corporation, Gramin Depot, theCorporation, theCorporation, Corporation, Supp, Court, KrishnaKumar v. Union of India, Apex Court, ProvidentFund Scheme, C.P.F., State, Corporation, the State Government, Corporation, the Employees Provident Fund, Employees Provident Fund, The State Government, Corporation, Corporation, the State Government

CARDINAL: 3, 16.9.1960, 28.10.1960, 350, 810, 1069/56, 375, 4, 28.10.1960, three, 2, 3, 3, 1, 4, 5, 21.4.1961, 1, 28.10.1960, 8.9.1961, 2, 28.10.1960, 6, 1.6.1972, 3, 5, 4, 7, 5, 7.6.1972, 8, 8, 1, 1, 1, 9, 10, 2, 5.7.1972, 1, 2, 1, 11, 39, 1, 2, 3424/302, 2, 1, 12, 7.1.1984, 6.12.1993, 3.2.1994, 6.5.1995, 22.6.1995, 28.11.1998, 13, 16.9.1960, four, 28.10.1960, 1, 242, 2, 141, 4, 1, 1, 439, 14, 1, 242, 28.10.1960, 28.10.1960, 16.9.1960, 22.9.1992, 28.10.1960, 22.9.1992, 15, 2603, 26.5.2000, 16.9.1960, 16, 1, 5.7.1972, 5.7.1972, 7.6.1972, 17, 5.7.1972, 19.6.1981, 5.7.1972, 5.7.1972, 82, 174, 1.7.1986, one, 18, 5.7.1972,and, 19, 4, 39, 1, 7.6.1972, 1, 1, 20, 5.7.1972, 1, 21, 2603, 2001,petitioner, 30.5.1994, 2000petitioner, 30.6.1997, 2, 141,Supreme, 1, 23, 24

DATE: '1947, '350, May 29, 1963, June 5, 1963, 1933, 1948, September 16, 1960, 29.7.1960, 1950, June 7, 1972, six months, one month's, one month, three month's, the month, June 7, 1972, July 5, 1972, June 7, 1972, June 7, 1972, daily, 1981, 1950, 19.6.1981, one month, July 5, 1972, one month, 1947, 1936, 1948, 1948, '39, July 5, 1972, 1972, 1972, a year, 16.7.1988, 22.6.1991, 8.9.1992, 18.9.1992, 6.12.1992, 18.9.1992, 4.9.1993, 1981, the year 1990, 15.12.1998, 28.10.1960, 8.9.1961, 11.12.1962, 1992, one year, 10 years, 1991, 1990, 1992, 1997, 1992, the year 1974, 32 of 1992, Roadways, 28th October, 1960, the day, 3.6.1962, 21,10.1981, 30.6.1997, para 1, 38 years, 30.6.1997, 1982, 1981, 58 years, 2002, 29.7.2002, the age of 58 years, 60 years in, the year 2001, 1999, 1981, June 7, 1972, 1981, 19.6.1981, 5.7,1972, 1981, July 5, 1972, 1981, 1981, 29.7.2002, 28.11.2001, 22, long ago, 2604, 28.2.1986, 19726, the year 1982, 1991, 1990, 1983, the year 1982

GPE: Shram, Rajasthan v., U. P. State, U.P.S.R.T.C., Government, the U. P. Roadways, Allahabad, D.S.Nakara

ORDINAL: first, first, first, third

PRODUCT: Para 2

EVENT: Regulation 4, Regulation 39, Regulation 39, Regulation 39 (ii

FAC: Sri Shiv Narain Singh

LOC: Employees ProvidentFund

WORK_OF_ART: Krishna Kumar's

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //