Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Himmat Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P and Others

Decided On : Oct-07-1999

Court : Allahabad

LAW: the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the Section 2, the State Act, Section 2, the Contract Labour Act, Chapter III, Rule 25, the Contract Labour Act, Rule 25, the Contract Labour Act, Rule 25, the Contract Labour Act, the State Act, Section 10 of the Contract Labour Act, the Contract Labour Act, the Section 2, the State Act, Rule 25, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the Contract Labour Act, Section 10, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, The State Act--Workman, Section 2, The Section 2, the State Act, Section 2, the State Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, The Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, Article 254 of the Constitution and Section 30, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act 10, the Section 2, Article 19(1)(g, Section 2, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Contract Labour Act 11, the Contract Labour Act, theContract Labour Act, the Contract Labour Act, the Contract Labour Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 10, the Contract Labour Act, the Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 10, the Contract Labour Act, Section 10, the State Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act?13, The Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, The Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 10, the Contract Labour Act, Section 10(1, Section 10, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, the Rajsthan Amendment, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Central Act, Article 254 of the Constitution, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Central Act, Section 2, the State Act, Section 2, the State Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, Section 2, the State Act, Rule 25, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, Section 2, the State Act, the Contract Labour Act, Section 2, the State Act, Section 2, the State Act

PERSON: Yatindra Singh, Abdul Rehman, Rehman, Rehman, Rehman, Rehman, Sri K.P. Agrawal, Sri S.N. Verma, Rehman, Ram Ujagir, Sri Verma, Sri Upadhyay, Ukai, Hind Majdoor Sabha, Sri Verma, Sri Upadhya, Rajasthan, Sri Hart Shanker Sharma u. M/s., Civil Misc, Markandey Katju, W. P. No, Palok Basu, B.S. Chauhan, Sri Verma, Sri Upadhyay, Pathak, Pathak, Rehman

ORG: the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, the U. P. Stale Industrial Disputes Act, The Indian Explosive Limited, The Fertiliser Workers Union, Labour, Labour, Labour, Union, The State Government, the Labour Court, The Supreme Court, SLP, The State Government, the State Government, The State Government, the State Government, StateAct, the Supreme Court, the Basti Sugar Mills, AIR 1964, the Dasti Sugar Mills Case, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Gujrat Electricity Board, Gujrat Electricity Board, Parliament, The State Government, the State Government, the State Legislature, sham, the Supreme Court, the Basti Sugar Mill, the Gujrat Electricity Board, the Air India Statutory Corporation, ULU, SC 109, the Air India Corporation, the Air India Corporation, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, Gujarat Electricity Board, Court, Gujrat Electricity Board, Bench, The Air India Corporation Act, the Gujrat Electricity Board, Court, the Air India Corporation, the Gujrat Electricity Board case.3rd, DECISIONS-CONTRARY, the Rajsthan High Court, Court, the Rajasthan High Court, Delhi Cloth Mills Company, PLR 847, the Rajasthan High Court, Court, The Decisions of this Court, Court, Gujrat Electricity Board, the Air India Corporation, Gujrat Electricity Board, Court, Court, India Ltd., State of U. P., SLP, Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, SLP, SLP, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Larger Bench, the Larger Bench, the Larger Bench, the Supreme Court, the Basti Sugar Mills, The Supreme Court, the Labour Court, the Supreme Court, Judgedecisions, Court

DATE: 1970, 20th March, 1984, JT 1995, 1996, 1992, 1947, 1947, 1996, 1990, 25th January., 1991, 15399 of 1988, 6th November, 1996--nowhere, 21

CARDINAL: Docs, 2, 2, one, 15.12.1984, one, 61, 2, one, two, 1, 2, 2, 9, two, 4, two, 2, 12, 10, 11, 17, one, three, 65, three, 19, 11.4.1997, 15-16, 1, 5, two, 2, two, two, 20, two, two, 1, two, two, two, 1, 23, 3, 24, 25, two

NORP: Rules

GPE: Sri V.B. Upadhyaya, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Judges, Rajasthan

LOC: company7

PRODUCT: 355

FAC: the Basti Sugar Mill, the Basil Sugar Mill

ORDINAL: second, first, first, first, first, fourth, first, fourth, first, first, 4th, first, first

WORK_OF_ART: The Effect of Dismissal of the SLP

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //