Emperor Vs. Ibrahim Khan

Decided On : Jun-29-1910

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 409, Indian Penal Code, Section 222, Section 222, Section 222, Section 222 Clause, Section 234, Section 234, Section 222, Section 234.9, Section 222, Section 234

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 208-12, 208, some 18, One, 2, 18, 25, 11, 253, 3, 5, 28, 257, 18, 18, 2, 254, 44, 165, 31, 928, 8, 807, 1, 32, 10, 51, 3, 29, 558, 5, 1898.5, 1, 2, one, one, one, three, more than three, one, 2, one, 2, three, 254, 165, 31, 928, 8, 807, 1, 32, 10, 51, 3, 29, 29, 558, 5, 17, 18, 24, only one, 2, 1, one, 12, 226, 5, 970, 11, three, one, three, one

ORG: the Local Government, the Meerut Cantoments, Cantonment, Privy Council, C.W.N., Court, the High Courts of Calcutta, King-Emperor, A.W.N., King-Emperor, A.W.N., C.W.N., C.W.N., L.J. 133, Court, Criminal, King-Emperor, A.W.N., King-Emperor, A.W.N., L.J. 637.11, the Calcutta High Court, C.W.N., L.J. 791, C.W.N., L.J. 133.12, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, King-Emperor, Court, constituting1, Clause 2 of Section 222

PERSON: Ibrahim Khan, Ibrahim Khan, Kellie 17 A. 153, Babu Lal, Subramanya Ayar v. King-Emperor, L.R., Gulzari Lal, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Samiruddin Sarkar v. Nibaran, Satnarain Tewari v., 138 Thomas v. Emperor, items.10, Gudzari Lal, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Samiruddin Sarkar v., Satnarain Tiwari v., L.J. 138, Thomas, Queen-Empress, Babu Lal, Kashinath Bagaji Sali, L.R., L.J. 337, Justice Chandravarkar

DATE: the 1st July and 1st, November 1909, the 1st July and 1st, November 1909, daily, 1902, 27 A. 69, 1904, 1898, 1898, one year, 12 months, the period of 12 months, 1902, 44, 27 A. 69, 1904, 1898, 1898, 1898, the 12 months, 12 months

GPE: Clause, Buddhu, I.A., L.J., L.J., L.J., Buddhu, C.19313, Cr

WORK_OF_ART: Queen-Empress, Queen-Empress v. Pursotam Das

PRODUCT: 104

LOC: Madras

ORDINAL: first