Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Public Prosecutor Vs. C.B. Thyagarajan
Decided On : Feb-21-1968
Court : Andhra Pradesh
LAW: the Criminal Appeal No, Section 92 of the Factories Act, the Factories Act, Section 85(1, Section 92, the Factories Act.3, Section 92, the Factories Act, Section 85(1, Section 85, Section 85(1, Section 85(1, Section 85, Section 2(m, the Factories Act, Section 2(m, Section 85 of the Act, Section 85(1, Section 2(m, Section 85(1, Section 85(1, Section 85(1, Section 85(1, Section 92 of the Act, Section 85(1, Section 92
CARDINAL: 1, 100, 1, 2, 1, 2, ten, ten, less than twenty, 2, ten, twenty, 2, 2, 1, 2, only two or three, 100.The
ORG: State, Court, Court, Court, Court, -(i, the State Government, Legislature, Sri Innayya Reddy, the State Government, Court, Court
DATE: 127/65, the year 1963-64, 1963, the preceding twelve months, the preceding twelve months, the preceding twelve months, the year 1960, the year 1960, the year 1963-64, 127/65, the finewithin one month, today, one month
PERSON: Ambika Mills, Murali Mohan Mills, Innayya Reddy, Gazette, Gazette, Murali Mohan Mill
QUANTITY: 9-2-20, 9-2-20
FAC: Jandamanu Street, Jandumanu Street
NORP: Sessions