Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Public Prosecutor Vs. C.B. Thyagarajan

Decided On : Feb-21-1968

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: the Criminal Appeal No, Section 92 of the Factories Act, the Factories Act, Section 85(1, Section 92, the Factories Act.3, Section 92, the Factories Act, Section 85(1, Section 85, Section 85(1, Section 85(1, Section 85, Section 2(m, the Factories Act, Section 2(m, Section 85 of the Act, Section 85(1, Section 2(m, Section 85(1, Section 85(1, Section 85(1, Section 85(1, Section 92 of the Act, Section 85(1, Section 92

CARDINAL: 1, 100, 1, 2, 1, 2, ten, ten, less than twenty, 2, ten, twenty, 2, 2, 1, 2, only two or three, 100.The

ORG: State, Court, Court, Court, Court, -(i, the State Government, Legislature, Sri Innayya Reddy, the State Government, Court, Court

DATE: 127/65, the year 1963-64, 1963, the preceding twelve months, the preceding twelve months, the preceding twelve months, the year 1960, the year 1960, the year 1963-64, 127/65, the finewithin one month, today, one month

PERSON: Ambika Mills, Murali Mohan Mills, Innayya Reddy, Gazette, Gazette, Murali Mohan Mill

QUANTITY: 9-2-20, 9-2-20

FAC: Jandamanu Street, Jandumanu Street

NORP: Sessions

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //