Executive Engineer and ors. Vs. Bharath Engineering Service Technocrats and Company - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Sep-12-2003

Court: Karnataka

LAW: the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Agreement, Section 33, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Agreement, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 33, the Arbitration Act, Section 33, the Arbitration Act, Section 33, the Arbitration Act, Section 33, the Arbitration Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 33, the Arbitration Act, Article 119 of the Limitation Act, Section 33, the Arbitration Act, Article of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, Article in the Schedule to the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Article 120 of the Act of 1908, Article 120, Article 113, Article 113, Constitution, the Limitation Act

PERSON: Mohan Shantana Goudar, Order, Order, Sri Kaliprasad, Order, Sri Kaliprasad, Order, Sri Kaliprasad, raised7, Order, Sri Kaliprasad, Order, Award, Order, Order, Order, Gopal Hegde, Madan Lal Dead, Lrs., Mohammed Esoof, V.R. Subramanyam, Anr, Order, Award, v. SUKHBIR SINGH, Award, V.R. SUBRAMANYAM, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Order, Award, Award, Award, Sri Gopal Hegde, dt.27.7, Sri Kaliprasad, Order, Sri Kaliprasad, Order, Sri Kaliprasad, Order, Sri, Kaliprasad, Sri Kaliprasad, Order, Sri Kaliprasad, Order, Sri Kaliprasad, Sri Kaliprasad, Order, Sri Kaliprasad, Order, Sri, Kaliprasad, Award, Sri Kaliprasad's, Sri Kaliprasad, Contractor, Award, v. C. RAJASEKHAR RAO, Contractor, Award, claimant.d, Award, Contractor, Contractor, Award, Contractor, Contractor, Award, Contractor, Contractor, Contractor, Order, Lordships, Order, Award, Award, Sri Kaliprasad, Sri Kaliprasad, Patri Basavana Goud

NORP: J.1

PRODUCT: the II Addl, Agreement, Awards, Awards, Awards, Awards, Award, Awards, consideration.30, Schedule, Judgment

CARDINAL: 3/91, 62/1991, three, three, 6.7.1981, 21,82,722.00/-b, 5, three, three, 2, 3, 27, 4, 4, 30-11-1995, three, 10-10-1996, 1967]3SCR147, 78, 3-8-1996, 10-10-1996, Two, 22, Two, 6, 6, three-fold, two, 14, 1987]3SCR569, one, 6, 6, 6, 1996.24, 6, only one, 6, 6, 1987]3SCR653, 1967]1SCR633, 28, one, 1, Six, 1, 2, 3, 6, 1, one, 4.10.1983, one, 07.11.1990, 62, two, 1992)ILLJ283SC, 1989(43)ELT790(SC, One, 41

DATE: 4/91, 10-07-1981, the year 1990, 31-5-1996, 3-8-1996, 10-10-1996, 3755, 3756, 3757 of 1996, 30-11-1995, 20-12-1997, 10-10-1996, 37 days, 30 days, 22-7-1997, 31-5-1996, 1967]3SCR147, 1963, 30 days, 3-8-1996, only 37 days, 10-10-1996, 322 days, 37 days, 1553, 1973/1993, 13-12-1994, 2818/1997, '19, 1993, '22, 31-7-1994, 3757, more than seven years, '31, 19.11.1990, years, three years, six years, three years

ORG: Awards, Awards, Court, the 'Department', Department, Kabini Right Bank Canal, Department, Department, I. Agreement, Department, Court, Department, Order, Department, Court, Court, Order, Court, Court, Order, Court, the Reference Court, Court, Awards, Department, Awards, Court, Department, Court, Court, Court, Court, Department, Court, Court on I.A.No, Order, Department, Awards, Court, Awards, Court, Government Advocate, Order, Awards, Department, Department, Court, Awards, Court, Awards, the Supreme Court, AIR 1957 MYSORE, Bar, Awards, Court, Court, Awards, the Government Advocate, the Government Advocate, Department, Court, Awards, Court, Department, condonation.12, the Supreme Court, LAL, ANR, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, GANGA SUGAR CORPORATION LTD, ANR, Court, Court, ANR, Court, Court, Court, Department, Court, the Government Advocate, Department, Court, Department, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Court, the Trial Court, Department, Agreement, Agreement, Learned Government Advocate, Learned Government Advocate, Clause - 30, Court, MFA, Court, the Supreme Court, U.P. v. TIPPERCHAND, Court, Lordships, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Superintending Engineer, Department, Court, the Engineering Department, the Engineering Department, PRASUN, ROY, the Apex Court, the Law of Arbitration, Russel, Party, SALEM, Apex Court, Department, Government Advocate, Department, Court, Court, Order on I.A. No, Court, Department, Court, Court, Court, Department, Court, Department, Order, Department, Department, Order, Department, Court, Department, Awards, Court, Department, Court, Department, Department, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, v. UNION OF INDIA, Apex Court, Court, Court, Department, EMD & FSD to claimant.e, EMD, FSD, Department, Department, Department, EMD, FSD, the Department, Court, the Hon'ble Court, Arbitrator, the Department, Department, EMD, FSD, Suffice, Civil Court, Department, Department, Department, Department, the Supreme Court, The Trial Court, Appellate Court, the Supreme Court, the State of Punjab, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Order, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Award, Awards, Court, a Civil Court, Contract, Court, Court, Awards, Court

GPE: I.A., I.A., Counsel, MOHAMMED ESOOF, Counsel, I.A., I.A., I.A., p.a., S.S.

WORK_OF_ART: Order that the Department, Award under Section 30, the Award of the Arbitrator, Order: The Appeals

LOC: Awards, Awards

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, Firstly, secondly, third, first, third

PERCENT: 71/2%, 15%, 20%, 20%