Semantic Analysis by spaCy
S. Borappa and anr. Vs. the State of Karnataka, by Its Secretary, Urban Development Department and ors.
Decided On : Nov-21-2003
Court : Karnataka
LAW: Section 3, the Architects Act, Section 2, Section 14, Section 25 and Section 35, Section 3 of the Act, the Architects Act, Section 2, Section 25, Section 25, Section 35, the Central Act, The Central Act, the State Act, the Central Act, Section 3 of the Act, the Architects Act
ORG: ORDERPatil, NAE, Government, the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, Government, the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, Court, Architecture, Notice, the Competent authority - Registrar of Council for Architecture, Government, Government, Government, Shaivagama, Architecture, Annexures-R1 to R3, Government, Architect, Government, the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, Architecture, Register, Authority, Architecture, a Town Planning Authority of the City of Mysore, the Town Planning, Architect, Architect, Government, Annexures - R1, the Council of Architecture, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, Government, Government, Government, Government
NORP: J.1
ORDINAL: 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 3rd, 2nd, 3rd, 3rd
DATE: 20th January 2003, 2001, 1987, 1987, 20.1.2003, 1972, the 1st, the 1st, 1st, the 1st, 20.1.2003, 1972, every ten years, 1972, 20.1.2003, 2001
CARDINAL: 2, 20.1.2003, 37, 20.1.2003, one
WORK_OF_ART: Notification
PERSON: Principal, Pleader, interalia, Vastushilpi, Notification, Notification, Vastushilpi Varga', Vastushilpi, Government Pleader, Pleader
FAC: Qualification
GPE: India, India
PRODUCT: Architect under Section 37