Mass Traders (P) Ltd. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Decided On : May-25-2005

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 269UD(1, the IT Act, Section 269UF(i, Chapter XX-C of the Act, Section 269UE(2, Section 269UD of the Act, Section 269UD(1, Chapter XX-C of the Act, Section 269UD(1, Chapter XX-C, the IT Act, Chapter XX-C ', Rule 48L, Section 269UC, Section 269UA, Article 226 of the Constitution are, the IT Act, the Land Acquisition Act, Chapter XX-A, Chapter XX-A, the IT Act, Section 52, the IT Act, the IT Act, Section 269D, Chapter XX-C, the IT Act, the IT Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Chapter, Chapter XX-C, Chapter, Chapter XX-C, the IT Act, Chapter XX-C, Chapter XX-C, Section 269UD(1, Constitution

ORG: ORDERR, Annex, Annex, the Appropriate Authority, the Central Government, the Appropriate Authority, Court, RBI, RBI, Court, Court, Court, this High Court, Annex, Annex, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Court, under:'In, the Appropriate Authority, the High Court, the High Court, the Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, the High Court, High Court, the High Court, the Appropriate Authority's, Notice, Department, Department, Court, SLP, the Supreme Court, SLP, SLP, Court, the Supreme Court, the Reserve Bank, Department, the Department, Court, Courts, Insofar as, Reserve Bank's, Department, the Appropriate Authority, the Central Government, RBI, RBI, Court, Court, Annex, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Annex, the High Court, the Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, the High Court, the High Court, the Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, the High Court, High Court, the High Court, the Appropriate Authority's, the Appropriate Authority, Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Department, the Supreme Court, DLF Universal Ltd., Appropriate Authority, The Supreme Court, the High Court, the Appropriate Authority under Section 269UD, Court, C.B. Gautam v. Union of India, Court, Court, Court, the apex Court, Court, Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Department, the Supreme Court, Section 269UD, DLF Universal Ltd., Appropriate Authority, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Appropriate Authority, Appropriate Authority, apex Court, the High Court, the Appropriate Authority, Union of India, Shatabadi Trading & Investment, Ors, the Supreme Court, the Appropriate Authority under Section 269UD, the Central Government, the High Court, Authority, CIT v. Smt, the Gujarat High Court, CIT, Madho Properties Ltd., the Calcutta High Court, the Competent Authority, CIT, P.I. George and Ors, Kerala High Court, Tribunal, WTO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Ajay Construction v. Union of India and Ors, the Patna High Court, Lily Shavak Doctor, Anr. v. Union of India and Ors, the Gujarat High Court, the Appropriate Authority, Authority, Court, the Appropriate Authority, Bombay High Court, Appropriate Authority and Ors, The Bombay High Court, Civil Lines, Authority, T. Amudha and Ors, Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, Authority, the Appropriate Authority, CWT, TTR, C.B. Gautam v. Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court, the Appropriate Authority, CBDT, the Appropriate Authority, Court, the Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, Court, the Appropriate Authority, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Authority, Court, Supreme Court, Appropriate Authority, Ors, the Appropriate Authority, the Central Government, the Appropriate Authority, the civil Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Authority, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Authority, Court, Authority, the Division Bench, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Division Bench, Authority, RBI, Authority, Authority, Department, the Appropriate Authority, Authority, the Corporation Development Plan, Authority, Authority, Authority, Authority, Authority, Authority, Authority, Authority, Authority, RBI, RBI, RBI, Department, RBI, Authority, Authority, Authority, Authority, Authority, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, C.B. Gautam, Appropriate Authority, Union of India, Shatabadi Trading & Investment, Ors, Court, Court, Court, Court

NORP: J.1, Indian, contra

PERSON: Annex, Aimai N. Irani, Darius N. Irani, Godrez K. Irani, Nos, Bangalore, Nariman K. Irani, Annex, Petitioner, Nos, Infantry Road, Sri Sarangan, Sri Seshachala, Sri Sarangan, Sri Seshachala, Aimai N. Irani, Darius N. Irani, Nos, Bangalore, Sri Seshachala, Anr, Sri Seshachala, Anr, Anr, Vimlaben Bhagwandas Patel, Anr, Gazette, Nirmal Laxminarayan Grover v., Nagpur Bench, Prabhakar Manoharrao Deshpande, Anr, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench, S.K. Golecha, Anr, R.C. Chawla, Sri Sarangan, Nos, Bangalore, Anr, Anr, Anr

ORDINAL: first, first, second, third, first, Third, Second, third, First, Third, Fifth, Fifth, First, 4th, first, first, first, first, 24th, first, second, third, First, First, third, first, first, second, First, second, first

CARDINAL: 2.85, two, 3:1, 4, Two, 37, transferee, two, 2, 3, 2, 3, 9 and 11, less than 15, 6, 13, two, 1:3, 4, 5, 37, transferee, two, 16, 1993.Learned, 14, 2000]243ITR730(SC, 37, two, 37, 2, 37, 37, 37, 2, 37, 1993]199ITR530(SC, 2158, 7, 28, 37, 37, 1999]235ITR118(SC, 251, 1979]118ITR134(Guj, two, four, one, two, 1981]131ITR380(Cal, 269D, 25,000, at least 15, 1988]171ITR620(Ker, 1,18,980, 1995]212ITR44(Patna, 212, 142, 223, 2004]266ITR292(Bom, two, 269, one, 270, 1A, two-fold, 2001]249ITR450(SC, more than 15, Two, one, only two, 6, 10, 1.75, two, 6, 6, 4/3, 457, 4, 5, 10, 8, more than 15, 227

DATE: 22nd May, 1989, 5, 1962, 23rd May, 1989, 1961, 25th July, 1989, July, 1989, 14319, 2164, 2165 of 1992, 1st, 8th March, 1993, 25th July, 1989, 1993, 14th June, 1993, 14th June, 1993, Sept., 1993, 14th June, 1993, 14th June, 1993, 14th June, 1993.'Annex, that day, dismissed.11, 22nd May, 1989, 25th July, 1989, 14319, 2164, 2165, 1993, 14th June, 1993, 14th June, 1993, 1961, 14th June, 1993, 14th June, 1993, 14th June, 14th June, 1993, a period of, eight weeks, eight weeks, 19th Jan., 2004, 2002, 16th Jan., 2003, '15, 2164, 2165 of 1992, 14th June, 1993, 14th June, 1993, 2001, 1TR 93, 1961, 1961, 1995, 1997, 2004, 1961, 2004, the year, the preceding year, 1961, 1961, 28th Sept., 2004, today, 14th April, 1989

FAC: Infantry Road, the Infantry Road, MG Road, Infantry Road

GPE: United States of America, Annexs, USA, Annexs, F1, Clause, Clause, Sections, Ernakulam, Bangalore

PRODUCT: Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Bench, Section 269UK, Rule 48L, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Section 269UD, Bench, Section 269UD, Articles 226

LOC: service.10, Infantry Road, Infantry Road, Infantry Road

MONEY: 15 per cent, 10 per cent, 15 per cent, 15 per cent, 15 per cent, 15 per cent, 15 per cent, 15 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: Queen's Road, Queen's Road and Infantry Road

QUANTITY: 422 per square foot, 422 per square foot, 14,200 square feet, 4,598 square feet, 20 feet, 457 per square foot, 457 per square foot, 609 per square foot, 670 per square foot, 747 per square foot, 747 per square foot, 422 per square foot