Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Capstan Engineering Works Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Mar-21-2003

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Partnership Act, section 25, the Customs Act, Chapter 37, the Customs Tariff Act, the Notification No, the I.D.R. Act

PERSON: Daga V.C., Nos, Jumbo Rolls, Press Note, Jumbo Rolls, Jumbo Rolls, Jumbo Rolls, Jumbo Rolls, Jumbo Rolls', Jumbo Rolls', Small Scales, Jumbo Rolls, Jumbo Rolls, Kotwal

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1932, 7th July, 1988, 7th July, 1988, 7th July, 1962, 52 of 1962, 1973, 1975, 1951, 65 of 1951, the 30th June, 1951, 1951, 30th June, 1985, 179/84, 30th June, 1988, another three years, 30th June, 8th June, 1986, 179/84, 206/85, 16th February, 1951, 16th February, 1973, a period of, 6 months, 1951, 1951, a period of, six months, 18-7-1986, a period of, six months, 1951, 1951, 1951, 1951

ORG: the Director of Industries, Maharashtra State, the Jumbo Rolls, the Central Government, the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, the Industrial (Development & Regulation, the New India Industries Limited, The Ministry of Industries, Government of India, Schedule IV, the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, Slitting/Confectioning, the Ministry of Industry, the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, C.O.B., I.D.R. Act, C.O.B., C.O.B., C.O.B., the Industrial (Development & Regulation, C.O.B., the Government of India, Medium Scale Units, The Government of India, the Small Scale and Medium Sector Industrial Units, the Government of India, I.D.R. Act, C.O.B., C.O.B., the Industries (Development & Regulation, the Apex Court, another v. Union of India & another

CARDINAL: 216/88, 216/88, 216/88, 1988.-In, 1, 51, 12, 206/85, 12, 1988.5, 1951.3, 17, 18, 2

FAC: the Jumbo Rolls

QUANTITY: 600 metres, 3 i.e.

GPE: India, valorem, valorem, Germany, Counsel, Kaniska

ORDINAL: first, firstly, Secondly

MONEY: 60 per cent

PERCENT: 60%, 60%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //