Shri Suhas Naik Vs. Planning and Development Authority - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Aug-16-1988

Court: Mumbai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Draft Regulation No. 5, Article 14 of the Consitution, Rule 13, Section 44, Section 140, Section 44, Section 140, the Architects Act, Article 14 of the Constitution.16, the Article 14 of the Constitution

ORG: G.F. Couto, the State Board of Technical Education, the Draft Regulations, the Victoria Jubilee Technical Institute, Central Technical Institute, Civil Engineering, the State Board of Technical Education, the European Construction Companies, Consulting Engineer at Mapusa, the Public Works Department, Chalta No, Mapusa, Respondent, Government, the Outline Development Plan, Court, Desai v. Union of India, inter alia, Certificate, Licenciate of Civil and Sanitary Engineering, Court, the Planning and Development Rules, the P.P.D.A. (Development Plans) Regulations, Regulations, Town Planning, Certificate, Licenciate of Civil and Sanitary Engineering, Engineer, the Register of Engineers, Authority, Engineer, Holder, Counsel for the Petitioner, the State Board of Technical Education, Maharashtra State, Government, Court, Court, Bachelor, Counsel for the Respondent, Court, Engineers, the All India Board of Technical Education, the State Board of Technical Education, State, Writ Petitions this Court, Engineers, Judgment, the Division Bench, Court, Government, the Statement of Objects, Ajay Kumar v. Union of India A.I.R., the High Court, the Supreme Court, Ajay Kumar's, Courts, the Supreme Court, Maharashtra State Board of Secondary, Education, Paritosh Bhupesh, Lordships, L.R. 428:--The Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Maharashtra State Board's

NORP: J.1, Omanian, Rules, Rules

GPE: Diploma, Engineering, Regulation, the Mapusa Municipality, Smt, Engineering, Engineering, Engineering, Engineering, Diploma, L.J., Diploma, development.10, Smt, Regulation, Engineering, Engineering, case.12, Smt, Regulation, Regulation

QUANTITY: 255 square metres, 255 square metres, 80 square metres, 80 sq. meters

DATE: 1984, 1972 to 1974, one year, the year 1981, August 6, 1988, December, August 26, 1986, September 10, 1986, February 12, 1987, February 27, 1987, 60 days, April 27, 1987, 1974, 1986, 1985, August 12, 1986, 1987, 1986, August 12, 1986, 1977, 1984, 1985, 1977, 1984, December, 1986, 1987, December 1987', today, 1987, 1977, 1977, at least 5 years, more than 5 years, 1984, 1984, 1130

PERSON: Goa, Municipalities, Andrew Francisce de Sousa, Andrew, Regulations, M.S. Usgaonkar, Daman, Diu Town and Country Planning Act, Meghana A.P. Desai v. Union, Panaji Bench, Goa Bench, L.J., W.P. N. 125, Goa Bench, Gao, Daman, Diu Town and Country Planning, Usgaonkar, Usgaonkar, Daman, Diu Town and Country Planning Act, Meghana A.P. Desai v. Union, Kakodkar, Daman, Diu Town and Country Planning, Meghana Desai's, Kakodkar, Usgaonkar, Meghana Desai's, Reasons, Kakodkar, Murthy Match Works, Asst, Kakodkar, Murthy Match Works', Kumar Sheth

CARDINAL: 1987.3, One, 2, two, 44, 123, 13.6, 123, 125, 5(1, 13, 5(1, 93.9, 5(1, 5(1, 5(1, 5(1, 5(1, 1978(2)ELT429(SC, 1985]1SCR29, 86, 5(1

EVENT: Regulation 5, the 1984 Regulation, the 1984 Regulations, the 1984 Regulations, the 1984 Regulations, the 1984 Regulations

ORDINAL: first, first, Secondly, second, first, second

WORK_OF_ART: the Engineering Course, Regulation

PRODUCT: Respondent