Gopalakrishnan Vs. State of Kerala

Decided On : Jan-29-2015

Court : Kerala

LAW: the Abkari Act, the Abkari Act, section 232 of the Code, the Abkari Act, Section 55, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, section 55, the Abkari Act, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, the Abkari Act, Pws 1 and 4, Pws 1 and, section 36, the Abkari Act, the Abkari Act, section 8, the Abkari Act, section 8(1, the Abkari Act, the Abkari Act, the Abkari Act, the Abkari Act, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, section 55, the Bombay Prohibition Act, section 43, the Abkari Act, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, the Abkari Act, Section 55, Section 8[(1, Section 55, Section 55, Section 8(1, the Abkari Act, section 8(2)of, Section 71, the Indian Penal Code, Section 31 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, Section 71, the Indian Penal Code, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, section 71, section 13, section 13(2, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, section 220, section 219, the Indian Penal Code, section 71, the Negotiable Instruments Act, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, the Opium Act, section 71, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, section 65, the Abkari Act, section 55, the Abkari Act, the Abkari Act, section 71, the Indian Penal Code, section 71, section 55, section 55, section 8(1, the Abkari Act, the Abkari Act, section 55(b, the Abkari Act, section 55, the Abkari Act, section 8(1, section 8(2)of, the Abkari Act

WORK_OF_ART: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR

GPE: K.RAMAKRISHNAN, SC.No.379/2008, Chingoli, V/124, Gurumandiram, Chingoli, V/124, Chingoli, Crl, Kerala, Pujamal Awadayappa v. State, Bombay, Crl, Pudukottai, Orissa, Pujamal Awadayappa v. State, Bombay, Crl, Kerala

DATE: 1936, 2014, this the 29th day of January, 2015, 55, 11.8.2004, 55, 2014, 2014 3, 55, one year, two months, 2014 4, 2014 5, 2014, 11.8.2004, 2014, 55, the next day, 2014 8, that day, 2014 9, 2014 10, 2014 11, 2014 12, 55, 2014 13, 55, 2014, 14 14, 2014 15, 43, 1962, 2014 16, 2014 17, ten years, 2014 18, 45 of 1860, 2014 19, fourteen years, 2014 20 21, 2006, 2014, 2014, 45 of 1860, 1958, 2014 23, 2014, 2014, only 47 years, six months, two months, six months, 2014 26, two months, six months, two months, 2014 27

ORG: THE JUDGMENT IN SC3792008 of ASST.SESSIONS COURT, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA, DATED2403-2014, ALAPPUZHA REVISION, ALAPPUZHA, the Assistant Sessions Court, Alappuzha, Abkari, Santhi Bhavan, Haripad, Crl, Magistrate, the Sessions Court, Alappuzha, Assistant Sessions Court, Alappuzha, Crl, the Sessions Court, Alappuzha, Additional Sessions Court, Alappuzha, Additional Sessions, Crl, Court, Court, Court, Court, to.7, Public Prosecutor, Court, Crl, Public Prosecutor, Crl, Ext, Crl, Ext, Ext, Ext, Ext, Ext, P9 Chemical Analysis Report, Gurumandiram, Ext, Crl, Crl, Crl, Crl, State, Court, Court, Abkari, Court, the Bombay High Court, Crl, Udai, KHC547 and Navo Vision Electronics Pvt. Ltd. &, Udai, Public Prosecutor, Sells, Act.18, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Udai, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, Inspector of Police, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hon'ble Supreme, Crl, Nova Vision Electronics Pvt.Ltd.&, State & another, the Delhi High Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, Court, Crl, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, Crl, Court, Crl, Court, P.S

CARDINAL: 96/2004, 8(1, 2, about 10, 4, 35, 8(1, 8, 2, 8(1, 2, 55(a, 6, 8(1, 2, One, two, about 10, 35, 4, 8(1, 2, 4, 4, two, 8(1, 2, 8(1, 2, 244, one, 55, 8, 1, 2, 55, 2, 2, 1, more than one, two, one, more than one, 19, one, one, two, 2, 3, more than one, two, one, more than one, 380, 11, 7, 13, 1, 2, 7, 13, 1, 220, more than one, 1, one, one, 2, one, 2, 1, one, 3, two, 4, one, more than one, one, 5, 71, 4, 9, 244, 2, 8(1, 2, One, One, One, One, One, One

PERSON: VELAYUDHAN, N. SURESH THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING, Karthikappally, Pws 1 to 5, Exts, Crl, Sri, S. Rajeev, Sri, S. Rajeev also.8, PW4, Santhi Bhavan, Karthikappally, PW5, PW4, Santhi Bhavan, Pws 1 and, Santhi Bhavan, Santhi Bhavan, Santhi Bhavan, Santhi Bhavan, Sri, S. Rajeev, Sri, S. Rajeev, R.P.No.793/2002, Arumughan v. State, Bhan v. State of U.P, Bhan v. State of U.P, Crl, Bhan v. The State of Uttar Predesh, Tamil Nadu, Puranmal Agarwalla v. State, Crl, Arumughan V. State, Sri, S. Rajeev, Sri, S. Rajeev, Sd/- K. RAMAKRISHNAN, Crl

FAC: the Abkari Act.3

LANGUAGE: P9

NORP: alleged.10, Indian

PRODUCT: Mos 1 to 6

TIME: 10 p.m., night

EVENT: the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act

ORDINAL: second