Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Modi Fibres Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. Modi Rubber Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 and ors.

Decided On : Jul-03-2009

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Indian Companies Act, Section 111A of the Act, Section 111A(4)(b, Section 111A(4, Section 111A(4)(b, Section 397/398, Section 235(2, Section 250(3, Section 397/398, Section 111A of the Act, Section 111A of the Act, Section 111A of the Act, Section 397/398, the Section 111/111-A, Section 433/434, Section 433, Section 397/398, Section 111A(4)(b, Section 111(14, Section 155, Section 58, the Evidence Act, Section 397, Section 433, Section 397/398, Section 397/398, Section 111A of the Act, Section 111A, Section 433, Section 433, Section 433(f, Section 111A of the Act, Section 111A of the Act

PERSON: A.M. Khanwilkar, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Laxmidas Lallubhai Patel, Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad v. Shantadevi P. Gaekwad, Nagindas Ramdas v. Dalpatram Iccharam, Appellants, Shivkumar Shankarrao, Appellants

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1956, 16/4/2009, 2008, 38, 1993, 1977, 1996, 13/3/2008, 15/4/2008, 1/5/2008, March, April, May 2008, 16/4/2009, 13/4/2008, 15/4/2008, 1/5/2008, two months, today, 17th July, 2009

PRODUCT: Judgment, Judgment, Appellant, Judgment, Judgment

ORG: the Company Law Board, CLB, Company Application, CLB, the Company Law Board, Petition, CLB, Section 111/111A, the Bombay High Court, CLB, Judgment, Court, CLB, Appellants, CLB, the Memo of Appeal, the Judgment under Appeal, CLB, Appellant, CLB, a)(b)&(e, Appellants, CLB, the Gujarat High Court, Gulabrai Kalidas Naik, Appellants, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Paragraph 223 236, Reliance, the Apex Court, B.L. Sreedhar and Ors, K.M. Munireddy (Dead, Coke, Court, CLB, Judgment, Appellants, CLB, CLB, Thakur Savadekar & Co. Ltd., SEBI & Corporate Laws-Reports Vol, the Apex Court, Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd., State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors, Waiver, Learned Counsel, CLB, CLB, Appellants, CLB, Paragraph 52, CLB, Appellants, CLB, Petition, CLB, Court, CLB, Counsel for the Respondent No, the Company Petition, Appellant, Court, Learned Counsel, the Company Petition, Court, Appellant, Court, CLB, CLB, Appellants, CLB, CLB, CLB, CLB, CLB, CLB, Company Petition, the Company Law Board, Appeal, the Company Law Board, Company Petition No, CLB, The Company Law Board, the Company Petition, Company Application, the Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, the Company Petition, Company Application

GPE: New Delhi, Paragraph

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 255, 3., 1, 1, 52, more than one, 5., 111A, 47, 151, 6., 1974]2SCR544, almost 45, two, 9, 103, 398, 1979]118ITR326(SC, 1, 8., 1, 1, more than one, two, one, two, only one, one, 9, 1, 1, one, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 10, 4, 11, 12, 13

TIME: 111A of the Act

ORDINAL: first, first, first

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Paragraph 16

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //