Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State Vs. Radhamal Sangatmal Sindhi

Decided On : Jan-19-1960

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 341, Section 207A, Section 341, Section 341, Section 341, Section 341, Section 342, Section 380, Section 341' of the Cr.PC7

ORG: ORDERGokhale, Judicial Magistrate, the Civil Hospital, Judicial Magistrate, the Public Prosecutor, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, the Sessions Court, Magistrate, the Court of Session fit, Court, Inquiry, Court, a High Court, the High Court, IPC, Magistrate, the Public Prosecutor, Judgment, the High Court, the High Court, Bombay, King Emperor, Monya 4 Bom LR 296, Magistrate this Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Boya Polamma, IPC, the High Court, the Allahabad High Court, Sections of the IPC, the Court of Sessions, the High Court Under Section 341, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Own, Court, Proceedings, Court, the High Court, Court, Magistrate, the Court of Session, IPC, the Sessions Court, Court, proceed1, IPC

NORP: J.1, Sessions

PERSON: Kolhapur, Radha, Sangatmal Sindhi, Madhumal Dholumal, P. G., Kolhapur, Kolhapur, Exh, Queen Empress, Somir Bowra, Ulfat, Justice Malik, Instant, Rex, ShevakramatuV, Kolhapur

DATE: 2nd December 1958, 3 2 1959, several years, 17 3 1959, 31 3 1959, one day's, 1947 All 490

CARDINAL: one, 3hould, 4, 27, four, 25, 194, 225, two, 302, 201, 1, 9, two

GPE: Understand, Emperor, Khashaba, A.I.R., Ulfat

WORK_OF_ART: 1941 Mad

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //