Laxmishankar Devshankar Vs. Hamjabhai Usufally Vohra and anr.

Decided On : Nov-25-1919

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Rule 98, Rule 99 or Rule 101, Article 11, the Indian Limitation Act

PERSON: Norman Macleod, Dattabharthi, Gadi, Mamlatdar, Dattabharthi, Shivbharthi, Dattabharthi, Shivbharthi, Dattabharthi, Dattabharthi, Shivbharthi, Dattabharthi, Laxmishankar, Laxmishankar, Shivbharthi, Shivnath, Laxmishankar, Order XXI, Shivnath, Order XXI, Order XXI, Order XXI, Order XXI, Meerudin Saib, Rahisa Bibi, Order XXI, Shivnath, Order XXI, Order XXI, Shivnath, Order XXI, Shivnath, Thakor, J.5, Dattabharthi

GPE: Ahmedabad, Suraj, Shivnath, Shivnath, Shivnath, England

FAC: the Dudhadhari Vadi, Shivnathji

CARDINAL: one, one, One, one, 3,000, 5,000, 1,201, 9,000, 5,000, 25,000, 12,000, 12,000, 87, 97, 103, 103, 103, 97, 215, 25, 4, 103, 103, 103, 103, 1911.4, one

DATE: 1886, 1902, 1904, 1904, the 1st, the 25th October 1904, 1910, the same year, 1904, February 1911, the 21st February 1912, 1915, 1912, 1913, 1913, 23rd February 1913, 1903, 1907, 1904, that year

ORG: Waghbharthi, Dattabharthi, Dattabharthi, Dattabharthi, Dattabharthi, Shivnath, Waghbharthi, Shivnath, Dattabharthi, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Bhivnath, Waghbharthi, Court, the Court of Appeal, Court, the Appeal Court, Heaton, Court, Court, Dattabharthi, Court of Appeal, Court

WORK_OF_ART: Shivnath and Shivbharthi, Shivnath and Shivbharthi, Rustamji's Limitation Act, 27 Mad, Subordinate

ORDINAL: First, second, second, second, second, secondly, thirdly

LOC: Shivnathji