Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

In Re: B.G. Horniman

Decided On : Sep-19-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 113, Section 68, the Indian Railways Act, Section 69, Section 113, Section 113, Section 113, Section 113, Section 112, Section 113, the Indian Railways Act, Section 118, Section 132, Section 113, Section 18, Section 182, Section 131, Section 113, Section 113, Section 133, Section 113, Section 113, Section 86, Section 435, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 86, Section 82, Section 82, Section 113, Section 113, the Indian Railways Act, Section 113, Section 113, Section 435, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 4, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 2, Section 48S, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 435, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 113, Section 145(1, Section 118(4, Section 145, Section 113(4, Section 67, the Indian Railways Act, Section 68, Section 68, the Indian Railways Act, Section 67, Section 67, Section 68, Section 68, the Indian Railways Act, Section 113, Section 113, Section 67

ORG: the Presidency Magistrate, Third Court, the Indian Railways Act, State, L.J. 962.3, Chapter IX, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, I.L.R., Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate of the third class.8, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Bombay District Municipal Act, Court, Magistrate, the Bombay District Municipal Act III, Magistrate, section.10, State, L.J. 952, the High Courts, C.W.N., King Emperor, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Sections 435, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, the Bombay District Municipal Act, the High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, District Magistrate, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Court, Court, the High Court, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Court, Magistrate, the Indian Railways Act, the Indian Railways Act, the Calcutta High Court, I.L.R., the Indian Railways Act runs:-If, Counsel

CARDINAL: 113(2, 3, 4, 48-11, 31, 87, 98, 99, 105, 106, 130, 131, 134, 4, 1, 2, 5, 515, 28, 440, 106, 180, 3, 3, 31, 440, 1, 166, 385, 95, 1819, 24, 195, 13, 381, 439, 607, 21, 864, 21, 755, 4, 48-11, 1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 192

DATE: 1890, 1930, 1925, 1893, 1901, 1901, 1901, 1980, 1893, 1899, 1897, 1897, 1928, 61912, 1891, 1889, 1918, 1919, 1901, 1885, '21, 68

PERSON: the G. I. P. Railway, Gobindram Jaichandrai, Bhimji N. Dalai v. B.B. & G.I. Railway Co., L.R., Queen-Empress, Kutrapa I.L.R., Gobindram Jaichandrai, Queen-Empress, Kutrapa I.L.R., JamesCrowson, L.R., Ram Pal, Habul Sheikh, Ma Kalay, A. Grey v. North Western Railway Administration, Manaji I.L.R., Devappa Ramappa I.L.R., L.R., L.R., Londe, Behere, Londe, Londe, Williams, Hart, Buskin, Barlee, J.23, Horniman

GPE: India, India, Subramania, I.L.R., I.L.R., Emperor, Dinbhai Jijibhai, I.L.R

ORDINAL: second, first, second, second, first, first, second, first, second, second, first, second, first, second

EVENT: Bombay Act III

NORP: Indian

WORK_OF_ART: Queen-Empress, Queen-Empress v.

TIME: three hours

FAC: Sections 67

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //