Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mathuradas Maganlal Vs. Maganlal Parbhudas

Decided On : Sep-21-1933

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 89, the Civil Procedure Code, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 89, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 89, Section 89, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the English Act, The English Act, the Indian Act, the Indian Act, the English Act, the Indian Act, the Indian Act, the Civil Procedure Code of, The Civil Procedure Code, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 2, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 2, Section 3, the Civil Procedure Code, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 3, Section 4, Section 15, Section 22, Section 2, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 525, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Code of Civil Procedure of 1882, Act, Section 2, Section 3 amends, Section 21, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Arbitration Act

PERSON: John Beaumont, Maganlal Parbhudas, Nos, Coltman, Maganlal Parbhudas, Coltman, Coltman, Justice Beaman, Adamji I.L.R., L.R. 366, Ramautar Sah v. Lingat Singh, Kotamma I.L.R., Justice Beaman, Coltman, Coltman, Reg, Coltman, Blackwell, J.7, Coltman, L.R., Khan, Alam Khan, Coltman, Coltman, Coltman, Justice Beaman, Adamji I.L.R., L.R., Kotamma I.L.R., Ramautar, Lingat Singh, Kulwant Sahay

GPE: Kt., Rukhanbai, India, England, India, Regulation, Sections 526, India, England, Chanbasappa, India, England, India, England, India, Rukhanbai

CARDINAL: 9, two, two, 9, 3, 6, 30, one, 17, 69, 10, 85, two, 312, 325, 327, 529, two, one, 1, 908, 29, 3, 414, one, 69, 10, 85, 94):The

DATE: 1929, 4, 5, 1908, 1932, Mad., 1899, 1889, 1827, 1859, 1861, 1827, 1877, 1882, 1899, 1882, 1927, 1254, 1827, 1882, 1891, 1899, permitted.11, 1908, 1932

ORG: the Sidhpur Mills Co. Ltd., him.2, Advocate General, Court, Court, the Patna High Court, the Madras High Court, Ponnamma, Court of Justice', Arbitration Awards, Regulation, Court, Sections 523 to 526, Court, Crown, the Madras High Court, Amberson Marten C.J., I.L.R., Civil Procedure Codes, Lordships of the Privy Council, Act, Piresidency, Ponnamma

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian

ORDINAL: first, second, second, second, second, second, first, third, first, first

LANGUAGE: English

EVENT: Regulation VII of, Bombay Regulation No

PRODUCT: Codes, Codes, Codes, Codes.10

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //