Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Emperor Vs. K.R. Bhat

Decided On : Jun-30-1931

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Section 215, Chapter XXI, the Criminal Procedure Code, Chapter XVIII, Section 347, the Criminal Procedure Code, Chapter XVIII, Section 120B, Section 120B, Section 467, Chapter XXI, the Criminal Procedure Code, Chapter XVIII, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 347, Section 347, Section 208, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 91, Chapter XVIII, the Criminal Procedure Code, Chapter XVIII, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 208, Section 208, Section 192, Section 190, Clause, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 190, Section 190, Section 529, Clause, Section 40, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Criminal Procedure Code the, Section 14, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 14, Section 231, Section 254 of the Code, Section 208, Section 211

ORG: Patkar, Ag, the Special Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Sections 420, the Court of Session, the Court of Session.5, Magistrate, the Court of Session under Section 347, Bombay High Courts, Coimbatore, L.J. 877, Legislature, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Court of Session, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Sessions Court, Damodaram, Court, the Special Magistrate, the Special Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate of the First Class, Magistrate, the Local Government, the District Magistrate, the Local Government, Magistrate, the Special Magistrate, the District Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Special Magistrate, Magistrate, the People's Own Provident, General Insurance Co. Ltd, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Sections 193,406, the Sessions Court, the Court of Session, the Special Magistrate, The Special Magistrate, the People's Own Provident, General Insurance Company Ltd.', Magistrate, Sections 206, Magistrate, the Sesipns Court, Magistrate, Court, the Sessions Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Local Government, District Magistrate, Magistrate, The Special Magistrate, the Special Magistrate, Magistrate, Sections 120B, Magistrate, Magistrate

CARDINAL: four, 4, 406, 477, 193.4, 321, 13, 177, 975, 442, 15, 256, 257, 1, 2, 995, 8), 1, 1, 205, 347, 196A, twenty-five, 420, 471, 477A., three, One, 213, one, 420

DATE: May 14,1931, March 9, 1931, the same day, 1912, 1912, 1903, 1898, 1908, 1923, 1923, 1914, 1929, July 5,1906, December 23, 1930, December 26, 1929, January 22, 1931, 467, December 27, the beginning of February

GPE: law.2, L.J., I.L.R.

ORDINAL: first, first, third

PERSON: Magistrate, Madras, Kangaya Mantradiyar, Channing Arnold, Muhammad Hadi, Clive Durant, Un, Cr., Phanindra Nath Mitra, I.L.R., Jyotsna Nath Sikdar v. Emperor, I.L.R., Schedule III, Schedule IV, Pleader, Schedule III, Dalvi, facie, Murphy, J.11, Poona, a C. I. D. Officer, Schedule IV of

NORP: Punjab

PRODUCT: Calcutta

FAC: trial.8

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //