In Re : Frank Portlock

Decided On : Mar-31-1926

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 57, the Indian Stamp Act, Article 23 of the Indian Stamp Act.4, Section 32, Section 24, Section 24, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 24, the Stump Act, Section 24, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 2 of the Act

PERSON: Norman Macleod, Frank Portlock, transferred.10, Fawcett, J.16, J.20

ORG: the Chief Revenue Authority, Alta, The Chief Revenue Authority, Court, Nirahui, Nagu bin Kondiba, Nagu, Legislature, Court, corners.19

DATE: 1899, June 14, 1921, February 6,1923, June 14, 1921, 1904, the year 1896, 1899, 1902, '12, 2,25,000.14, 1904, 1904

CARDINAL: one, 5,25,000, 2,625.3, 2,75,000, 4,125, 2,25,000, 3,375, 2,625, 29, 203, two, 294, one, 60, 550, 294, two, four, 400, 200, 750, 206):We, 11, four, 29, 203Crump, 29, 203

GPE: Bai Chandanbai, valorem, Nirabai, I.L.R., Nirabai, S.No, valorem, mortgagee, valorem, Nirabai, I.L.R., Nirabai, I.L.R.

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, first, third