Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Smt. Lata Pimple Vs. the Union of India and Others

Decided On : Jan-08-1993

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Family Courts Act, Bill No, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 32-A, Section 3, the Book 'Constitutional Law of India', Constitution, Constitution, Hindu Marriage Act, Hindu Marriage Act, the Family Courts Act, Constitution, Chapter IV of the Act, Constitution, Indian Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Order 32-A of the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, Rule 15, Rule 15, Order 32-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Civil Procedure Code, Constitution, Constitution, the Civil Procedure Code, the Hindu Marriage Act, Article 14 of the Constitution to Section 3, Section 13 of the Act, Article 19(1)(a, Constitution, Article 21, Section 13 of the Act, Section 13, Section 13, Rule 37, Rule 37, Article 21, Section 13, Article 21 of the Constitution, Section 13, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 9-A, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Section 13, S. 13, Constitution

CARDINAL: ORDERKurdukar, 226, 3 and 13, one, 14, 19(a, 3, one million, one million, 14, 2, 273, 1981)ILLJ103SC, two, 14, 14, 1 million, 1 Million, 1 Million, one, 1 Million, 14, 1 Million, 1979]2SCR476, 64 to 73, 73, 14, 14, 14, 3, one, 10, 16, 14, 14.8, 10, 10 and 14, 15, 15, 109, 3, 4, 14, two, one, 14, 160, 10 to 14, 1 Million, 1 Million, 1 Million, 1 Million, 1 Million, 14, 1959]1SCR279, 11, 2, 14, 1955]1SCR1004, 10, 14, 2, 1979]2SCR476, 3, 1980CriLJ965, 13, one, 39, 13, two, AIR1991Bom105, 2, 1986CriLJ1084, 1986]1SCR251, 22(1, 1976)IILLJ409SC, 44, 36(4, 404):'Now, 22(1, 22(1, 22(1, 13.18, 4, 21, 39, 1992]3SCR595, 518.20, 14, 14, 22(1, 1982CriLJ340, Two, 18-3-1989, 3393/89, 16, 16, 3859/89

NORP: J.1, Rules, R., Rules, Rules, Rules, Maharashtra, non-Tribal

PERSON: Art, Gole, Gole, Gole, H. M. Seervai-III Edition, Art, Gole, Art, Gole, Art, Gole, Gole, Kishan Singh v., Rajasthan State, Art, Gole, Gole, Art, Art, Gole, Leela Mahadeo Joshi v. Dr., Mahadeo Sitaram Joshi, Counsellor, Counsellor, Bhatewara, Orissa, Dhirandhranath AIR, fanciful.10, Agarwal, S. 3 nor Ss, Agarwal, Counsellor, Counsellor, Agarwal, Krishna Dalmia, S. R. Tendolkar, Sakhawant Ali v. State, Art, Agarwal, viz.:l, Kishan Singh, Rajasthan State, Delhi Admn, Counsel, Gole, Gole, Gole, Leela Mahadeo Joshi v., Mahadeo Sitaram Joshi, Govindram Bhihani, Kishorilal Bihani, Gole, M. H. Hoskot v. State, Olga Tellis v., Umed Ram Sharma, Agarwal, S. 36(4, Art, Art, Art, Art, Agarwal, Gole, Anturkar, Anturkar, Art, Art, Art, 19(1)(a, S. 13, Anturkar, Agarwal, Seema, Art, A. K. Roy v. Union of India, Agarwal, Vijay Kaur Radhyesham, Agarwal, Kanak Mehta, Vinod Mehta, W. N. Yande, Agarwal, Nagpur, S. 13.27, Gole, Exh, Nos

GPE: India, India, Hasia, Hasia, Hasia, P.C., Hasia, Hasia, Art, Art, India, Art, C.P.C., Art, India, Art, Art, Metropolitan, Metropolitan, Art, Art, India, Orissa, Art, Notwithstanding, Art, Lingappa, India, Art, Kishorilal, Art, India, Art, Bansidhar, India, India, Bombay

DATE: 1984, the year 1984, 1984, 1974, the year 1976, the year 1984, 14, 1955]2SCR531, 1978, 14, 15, the year 1976, 14, 1961, 1715, 1983, S. 3(1)(a, years, 12, 14, 1955]2SCR531, 1978, 1989, 21, 1992, 1971, 35, 1142, 1987, S. 3(1)(a, S. 13, 1992, 1699/ 89, 2693/89, 3363/89, 1636/89

ORG: Judges of the Family Court, Statementof, the Family Courts, The Law Commission, 59th Report, Court, Family Courts, the Family Courts, Arts, a Family Court, Court, the State Government, HighCourt, State, a Family Court, Family Courts, State, The State Government, the High Court, Family Court, the State Government, Family Courts, the State Government, Family Courts, State, the State Government, Author, the Supreme Court, Civil Courts, the State Government, Family Courts, the State Government, Family Courts, Family Court, Family Courts, Courts, Family Courts, Family Court, the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Court, the District Court, the Family Court, Family Court, Family Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, Family Courts Act, the State Government, the State Government, Family Courts, Family Courts, the Supreme Court, the Family Court, Civil Court, the Indian Evidence, the Civil Court, S. 14, O.32, the State of Maharashtra, the High Court, the State of Maharashtra, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, the State Government, the Supreme Court, the Union of India, S. 3, the State Government, Family Courts, Family Court, the State Government, the High Court, the Law Commission, Court, the Union of India, Court, the State Government, Family Courts, the Family Courts, the Supreme Court, Apex Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, SupremeCourt, the Union of India, Family Court, Family Courts, Court, Family Court, Family Court, the Family Court, Amicus, the Family Court, Court, MLJ 997.This Court, the Supreme Court, Suk Das v. Union Territory of Arunachal Pradesh, State Cost, Gole, the Supreme Court, Bombay Municipal Corporation, the Supreme Court, State of Himachal Pradesh, the Union of India, Court, the Supreme Court, Paradip Port Trust, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands, the Supreme Court, Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Kanpur Bar Association v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Arts, the Supreme Court, PerfectPaper and Steel Converers P. Ltd., TheBombay National General Workers Union1989, the Family Courts, Court, the Family Court, Court, Court, the Allahabad High Court, the Allahabad High Court, Allahabad High Court, the Supreme Court, the Rajasthan High Court, the Union of India.23, the Family Court Act, High Courts, Court, the Division Bench, Additional Government Pleader, the State of Maharashtra, the State Government, Family Courts, Family Courts, the Government of Maharashtra, Bar Council of Maharashtra, the Family Court, Court, Court, the Family Court

ORDINAL: firstly, first, first

PRODUCT: Family, MLJ 997, Family Courtskeeping

EVENT: the Civil Procedure Code

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India

LOC: Pune

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //