Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

In Re: Pothan Joseph

Decided On : Mar-22-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 23, the Indian Press Act, Section 3, Section 7, Section 3, Section 4, Section 4, Section 3, Section 72, Section 4, the Indian Press Act, Section 4, Section 21, Section 4, Section 29, Section 32, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 34, Section 51, the Indian Press Act, Section 499, the Indian Penal Code, Section 4, the Indian Press Act, Section 124-A of the Indian Penal Code, Section 124A, the Indian Penal Code

PERSON: John Beaumont, Matt, Ordinance, Majesty, Majesty, Ordinance, Ordinance, Taleyarkhan, Taleyarkhan

GPE: Kt., India, India, India, Magistrates, Magistrates

DATE: 1931, March 11, 1932, today, February 26, January 4, 1932, February 6, 1932, January 4, 1932, two years, two years

CARDINAL: two, 3, 3, 3, 1, three thousand, 3, two, two, 1932.2, 3, 4, 1

ORG: the Government of Bombay, the Local Government, the Local Government, Magistrate, the Local Government, the Indian Daily Mail, the Local Government, the Government of India, the Government of India Act, the Indian Daily Mail, the Local Government, Special Courts, Courts, Magistrates, Court, the Advocate General, Magistrates, Magistrates, the Times of India, Government, the Government of India, the Local Government, the Local Government, the Advocate General, Court, not.6, Government, the Indian Press Act, Government

NORP: Indian, British, British, British, European, British

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //