H. Vs. H. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Feb-01-1928

Court: Mumbai

LAW: the Divorce Act, Section 19, the Indian Divorce Act, Section 19, Section 7 of the Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 45, the Indian Divorce Act

ORG: Amberson Marten, the Divorce Courts, Indian Courts, Court, the Chancery Courts, Courts, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, PremcJiand, Court, Court, Court, know.10, Court

GPE: Kt., England, Bow., England, District Judges, India, India, Bombay, Scotland, J.12

FAC: Premchand Hira v.

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, Secondly, Thirdly, Fourthly, first, first, first, second, second

CARDINAL: three, 16, one, two, one, no less than three, One, two, at least two, One, 10, 171, 185, 186, 186):-

PERSON: Birkenhead, C. Contrasting, Bai Galal, Blackwell, i. e., Crump, J.11, Blackwell

DATE: four days', the seventeenth century, 1911, 1919, 1885, 1877, about nineteen months, two months and a half, 1879, 1853

NORP: Christian, British, English, Indian, English

LOC: the District Judge