Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Frexton Cables (India) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Decided On : Mar-13-2002

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Anti-Evasion, Section 11A of the Act, Section 11AB, Rule 173Q, Section 11AC, Chapter Heading 8544, Rule 173C(3A, Section 11A, Section 4(4)(b, Section 11AC, Section 11AB, Section 4, Section 2(h, Section 26, the Sale of Goods Act, Section 23, the Sale of Goods Act, Section 39(1, Section 2(h, Section 26, the Sale of Goods Act, Section 26, the Sale of Goods Act, Section 4

CARDINAL: 1, 24, 11,74,859/-, 173C, 173F, 173, One, 119, 191, 38, 637, 118, 650, 35, 9, two, 13, 4,00,000, 119, 191, 38, 637, 118, 650, 35, 9, 118, 650, 35, 9, 1944.10, 1930.12

ORG: assessee M/s. Frexton Cables (, Revenue, Central Excise (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Delhi Commissionerate, the Central Excise Rules, the Central Excise Rules, Wires, Rate Contracts, Tribunal, Prabhat Zarda Factory Ltd., CCE - 2000, Tribunal-LB, Escorts JCB Ltd., CCE, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Excise Rules, The Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Zarda Factory Ltd., CCE - 2000, Tribunal-LB, Escorts JCB Ltd., CCE, Delhi/New Delhi, Delhi/New Delhi, Escorts JCB Ltd., M/s. Prabhat Zarda, Escorts JCB Ltd., CCE, Tribunal, Escorts JCB, Escorts JCB, Tribunal, Delhi/New Delhi, Delhi/New Delhi, E/1565-68/2001-A (M/s. Mauria Udyog Ltd., the Sale of Goods Act, the Sale of Goods Act, M/s. Mauria Udyog Ltd., Delhi/New Delhi, Revenue.13

GPE: India, New Delhi, New Delhi - 2000, N.T., New Delhi - 2000, Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi - 2000, Delhi, New Delhi

DATE: 1-11-99, 1944, 5 years, 1944, 1944, 1944, 1985, the period of, six months, 2000, 1999, 1944, 5 years, 2000, 1999, 1944, 1999, 1930, 2001, 1930

PERSON: Cables, Schedule, Government Departments, Zarda, Zarda, Zarda, Zarda, Zarda, Escorts JCB.9

PRODUCT: Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //