The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. India Cements Ltd.

Decided On : Dec-11-2014

Court : Chennai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Subordinate Officers, Article 309 of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Rule 2(b, Constitution, Article 16 of the Constitution, Article 16 of the Constitution, Article 16 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 309 of the Constitution, Article 309, Constitution, Rule 5, Rule 5, Rule 6, Constitution

PERSON: JUDICATURE, Tamilnadu Govt, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Perumbulavil Radhakrishnan, R.Rengaramanujam, Veeraraghavan, R.Neelakantan, M.Baskar, Perumbulavil Radhakrishnan, R.Rengaramanujam, Veeraraghavan, R.Neelakandan, M.Baskar, No.155, Transfer, Transfer, Transfer, G.O.will, Transfer, Transfer, Articles 14, Articles 14, S.Veeraraghavan, Articles 14, Chandrakant Anant, Supp, Chanchal Goyal, Kurien v. K.J.Augustin, Note, Articles 14

CARDINAL: 12.10.2009, 336, 3.Tamil, 1.Tamil, 002, 2.State, 3.Tamil, 3.Tamil, 10.03.1998, 7.2.2000, 6.10.2001, 336, four, four, 2.This, 3.Heard, 336, 6, II, 3, 2.In, 99, 36, 63, 1, only 9, 99, 7.After, six, 25.2.1999, 4.5.1998, five, 10.In, 11.The, 7.2.2000, seven, 12.The, 13.6.2000, 2.5.2001, 13.The, 6.10.2001, six, 23.11.2001, four, 16.The, 17.The, 2.Must, 3.Must, 1.Must, 2.Must, 3.Must, 2, 18.The, 6, II, 3, 19.According, 6, 20.While, 16, 21.The, 16, 16, 23.In, 24.In, 16, 25.Since, 1, 14, 14, 1, 4, three, 141, 16, 2, 17, 1, 3, 31, 28.The, 6, 8, 8, one, 2, two, 9, 15, one, one, two, 15, 30.The, 2, 47, 60, 47, 58, 60, 31.The, 3, 24, 24, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 27, 14, 3, 5, 1, 2, 3, 3, 28, 16, 3.The, 600 002

ORG: HONOURABLE, Regd, Planning & Development Department, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Nadu Public Service Commission, Tamilnadu Govt, Nadu Public Service Commission, Planning & Development Department, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Tamilnadu Government, R.Srinivasan, Planning & Development Department, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Nadu Public Service Commission, Tamilnadu Government, Regd, No.297/90, R.Srinivasan, Planning & Development Department, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Nadu Public Service Commission, Chennai-600 002.Respondents W.P.No.35548 of, Ref, Additional Advocate General, the Statistics Department, the State Government, Tribunal, Additional Advocate General, Government Advocate, OA, OA No.3593, Planning and Development (Statistics) Department, the State Government, the Tamil Nadu Statistics Service, Government, the Tamil Nadu Statistics Service, the Department of Statistics, the Tamil Nadu Statistics Service, Statistics, the Statistics Department, the Tamil Nadu Statistics Service, the Tamil Nadu Statistics, Tribunal, State, State, Tribunal, Court, M.P.No.1 of 2008, Tribunal, Tribunal, Association, OA No.3880, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Association, OA No.7142, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Statistical Department, the Tamil Nadu Statistical Services, Statistics, Statistical Officers, Statistics, Statistics Direct, Statistics, Mathematics, Economics, Mathematical Economics, the Statistical Investigation, No.162, dt.24.11.88, No.200, dt.22.12.93, Statistics, Mathematics, Economics, Mathematical Economics, Statistical Investigation, Statistics, Mathematics, Economics, Mathematical Economics, the Statistics Department, the Statistics Department, Department, the Statistics Department, Statistics, Mathematics, Economics, Mathematical Economics, the Revenue Division, District Statistical, Statistical Officers, the Department of Statistics, the Department of Statistics, Transfer 3)Direct Recruitment, Subordinate Services Rules, Special Rules, State, Additional Advocate General, the State Government, State, The State Government, Association, the Supreme Court, 26.The Supreme Court, Union of India v. S.L.Dutta, Additional Solicitor General, Court, State, Maharashtra v. Chandrakant Anant Kulkarni, Court, Court, Court, State, Maharashtra v., Air Marshals, the Supreme Court, Syed Khalid Rizvi v., Union of India, Supreme Court, Union of India, 29.The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, Government, Supreme Court, Haryana, Union of India, Hindustan Development, Supreme Court, the Kerala Government, Special Rules, the Service Rules, the General Rules, General Rules, the Special Rules, Court, generaliabus specialia, specialibus, the General Rules, Government, State, Government, Association, Tribunal, State of, Tamil Nadu, Planning & Development Department, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission

GPE: K.CHANDRU, W.P.Nos.35548, W.P.Nos.35548, OA, OA, OA, OA, OA, OA, No.24/98, OA, OA, OA, OA, OA, M.A., M.Sc., B.A., B.Sc., W.e.f.27.10.87, M.A., M.Sc., B.A., B.Sc., B.A., B.Sc., B.A., B.Sc., dt.29.5.89., N.Y.Apte, S.G.Jaisinghani v. Union of India, Jitendra, Kumar v. State, S., the State of Kerala, S., S.

DATE: 37290, 43968 of 2006, 9504 OF1998 3880 of 2000, 2001, 2006, 2006, 2007, 2006, 22.10.1991, 2006, 2006, 2007, 37290, 2006, 2007, 12.9.2009, 37290, 2006, 2007, 1998, 22.10.1991, 10.3.1998, 22.10.1991, 10.3.1998, 4.5.1998, 10.06.1999, 2006, 1998, 18.11.1998, 2006, 2.2.2007, 2000, 2001, 2006, 2001, a period of, two weeks, 8.11.2001, 2007, 30 years of age, less than three years, five years, 57 years of age, less than three years, 5 years, less than two years, less than one year, a period of, two years, the 29th May 1989, Rule 6, 1991, 17, 18, 1981, 1990, 1993, 31, 1998, 1967, future years, 2008, 58, 2008, 27, 28, 1958, 1968, 1958, 1992, 1974, 1992, 1968, 1958, 1968, 1958, 1968, 1974, 1974, 1974, 1958, 1974, 32.But

ORDINAL: third, third, third, third, third, third, fourth, fourth

WORK_OF_ART: No.24/98

FAC: the Tamil Nadu State, the Tamil Nadu State, the Tamil Nadu State, the Navigation Stream

NORP: Statistics, K., Rules, Rules, Rules

LOC: Superintendent

PERCENT: 80%, 20%, 25%, 20%, 75%:25%, 75%, 25%