Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

K. Bharathi Devi Vs. The State Of Telangana

Decided On : Oct-03-2024

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 482, Section 13(1)(d, Section 482 CrPC, the Appellant No.1, Section 482, Article 142 of the Constitution of India, Article 142 of the Constitution of India, Article 142 of the Constitution, the Constitution 12 Bench, Article 142, Article 142 of the Constitution, Article 142, Section 420 IPC, Section 420, Section 320, Section 320, Section 482, Section 482, Section 320, Section 482, Section 482, Section 307 IPC, Section 320 of the Code, Section 307 IPC, Section 13(2, Section 320 of the Code, the Penal Code, Section 420 IPC, Section 120-B IPC, Section 482 CrPC, Section 482, Section 482 CrPC, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482, Section 320 of the Code, Section 482, Section 307 IPC, Section 307 IPC, Section 307 IPC, Section 307 IPC, Section 482, Section 482 of the Code, Section 307 IPC, Section 307 IPC, Section 482 CrPC, Section 307 IPC, Section 307 IPC.33, Section 482 CrPC

DATE: 2024, 2018, September 2017, 1973, 2014, 31st March 2010, 2010, September 2012, September 2012, 467, 1988, 27th December 2013, 19th November 2015, 21st November 2015, 2016, 18th April 2016, May 2016, 54, 2008, 2012, 2014, 2014, appeal.11, 2014, 2017, 1992, 1992, 1992, 1987, 1987, 1989, 1991, 1998, 1998, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2010, 2012, 2003, 2008, 2008, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2003, 2008, 2008, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012, 1990, 1993, 1993, 1999, 1076, 2008, 2009, 1153, 2009, 2009, 2012, 1990, 1993, 1993, 1999, 1076, 2008, 2009, 1153, 2009, 2009, 2012, 467, 2003, 2008, 2008, 2008, 2010, 2003, 2008, 2008, 2012, 2012, 61, 2003, 2008, 2008, 2012, 2012, 1188, 2013, 2012, 34, September 2017, 2014, 2021, 2024

ORG: INSC750REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.4353, ANR, the High Court of Judicature, the State of Telangana, the State of Andhra Pradesh, the High Court, the Criminal Petition No.5778 of, CrPC, Principal Special, CBI Cases, Court, the Indian Bank, Osmanganj Branch, Hyderabad, Accused No.3 & 4, Non-Performing Asset, No.2 Bank, Original Application, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Hyderabad, DRT, DRT, No.2 Bank, No.2 Bank, the Central Bureau of Investigation – Economic Offence Wing, CBI-EOW, CBI, IPC, the Prevention of Corruption Act, CBI, Court, Court, DRT, No.2 Bank, OTS, No.2 Bank, No.2 Bank, OTS, No.2 Bank, Criminal Petition, the High Court, Court, CBI, the Criminal Petition, the High Court, DRT, OTS, No.2 Bank, The High Court, the Criminal Petition, Bank, Additional Solicitor General, CBI, Court, DRT, No.2 Bank, Bank, DRT, OTS, No.2 Bank, Bank, Court, Central Bureau of Investigation, SPE, SIU, Duncans Agro Industries Ltd., Central Bureau of Investigation and another2, Central Bureau of Investigation, ACB, Gold Quest International Private Limited v. State of, Central Bureau of Investigation v., No.2 Bank, Bank, CBI, Bank, the High Court, CrPC, Bank, OTS, Court, Duncans Agro Industries Ltd., Calcutta, Court, the High Court, Court, Duncans Agro Industries Ltd, Court, Court, Court, Court, CBI, Court, Supreme Court Bar Assn, Union of India, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Additional Solicitor General, Additional Solicitor General, Neemuch Emballage Ltd., Company, Bank, Company, Section 320 CrPC, Company, Bank, Bank, Bank, Company, Court, Court, Company, Bank, Bank, Court, IPC, Section 320 CrPC, Court, Court, State of, Court, Company, Court, Company, Bank, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Bench, the High Court, the High Court, IPC, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, FIR, the High Court, FIR, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Sections 120- B/420/467/468/471 IPC, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, Court, IPC, Court, the High Court, FIR, FIR, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, FIR, Court, Court, Court, Court, Bank, Bank, Court, Haryana, L&S, Bank, the High Court, the High Court, inter alia, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, the High Court, FIR, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Sarpanch, Court, Gold Quest International Private Limited, Bank, FIR, Bank, Bank, Bank, Equated Monthly Instalments, OTS, OTS, Bank, DRT, High Court, the High Court of Judicature, the State of Telangana, the State of Andhra Pradesh, Principal Special, CBI Cases, Hyderabad, AOR

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, Nampally, Accused Nos, Accused Nos, Accused Nos, Shri Dama, Seshadri Naidu, Devina Sehgal, Himanshu Munshi, Shri Naidu, Shri Naidu, Nikhil Merchant v., Gian Singh, Narendra Lal Jain, Singh, another5, SCC6773, Tamil Nadu, others6, Sadhu Ram Singla, Himanshu Munshi, Accused Nos, Accused Nos, Accused No.1-K. Suresh, Accused No.1.15, Bhajan Lal, Supp, SCC, Supp, SCC, Janata Dal, SCC, Tulsi, Banks, Banks, Banks, Banks, Banks, Banks, Banks, Banks, Banks, Nikhil Merchant, B.S. Joshi, B.S. Joshi, B.S. Joshi, SCC67515, Bench, Manoj Sharma, Bench, Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, another10, B.S. Joshi, Nikhil Merchant, Manoj Sharma, Bench, Gian Singh, supra)11, R.M. Lodha, 59.B.S. Joshi, Nikhil Merchant, Manoj Sharma, Shiji, Nikhil Merchant, Manoj Sharma, Shiji, SCC, Cri LJ1049, Arun Shankar Shukla, Ishwar Singh, Rumi Dhar, Ashok Sadarangani, SCC, Arun Shankar Shukla, Ashok Sadarangani, B.S. Joshi, Nikhil Merchant, Manoj Sharma, B.S. Joshi, Nikhil Merchant, Ashok Sadarangani, Ashok Sadarangani, Bench, B.S. Joshi, Nikhil Merchant, Manoj Sharma, B.S. Joshi, Nikhil Merchant, Manoj Sharma, Bench, Narendra Lal Jain, Gian Singh12, B.S. Joshi v. State, Nikhil Merchant, Gian Singh, Gian Singh v. State of, Bench, Singh, Sadhu Ram Singla, Sadhu Ram Singla, Accused No.1.37, Nampally, No.68579

NORP: J.1, Sirish, P.P. Sharma, SCC321

CARDINAL: 1, 3.1, 3.2, 1-5, 23.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 420, 409, 468, 471, 13(2, 3, 3.7, 1-5, One, 3.8, 3.8, 1 to 5, 43.9, 3.10, 1, 5, 3.11, two, No.2, No.3, No.4, 7,78,25,143/-, 1,07,54,000/-, 1, 9, 10, 5, 6, 6, 15, 5, two, 3 and 4, 2, 1, 26, 9, 1, 426, 1, 192, 4, 28, 29, 10, 11, 25, 4, 13, 2, 848, 14, 848, 2, 8, 4, 2, 2, 3, 16, 15, 57, 11, 10, 18, 848, 9, 3, 858, 16, 4, 145, 10, 1, 848, 9, 3, 858, 16, 4, 145, 10, 1, 19, two, 2, 1, 333, 15, 3, 6, 2, 11, 2, 1, 333, 15, 3, 20, 6, 2, 13(1)(d, 11, 465, 468, 471, 21, one, 848, 9, 3, 858, 16, 4, 145, 848, 9, 3, 858, 11, 11, 22, 23, 3, 24, 60, 25, 3, 13, 12, 26, 120, 3, 848, 9, 3, 858, 10, 4, 1, 160, 2, 988, 27, 2, 29, 1, 28, 29.2, two, 29.3, 29.4, 29, 29.5, 29.6, 30, 29.7, 32, 33, 1, 2, 35

GPE: C.C., OA, OA, Accused No.2, New Delhi, Mumbai, others4, justice.26, Mumbai, B.S. Joshi, Simrikhia, SCC321, Simrikhia, Ishwar, SCC321, SCC321, proceedings.27, B.S. Joshi, C.C., I.A., NEW DELHI

FAC: Uradh Dhall

ORDINAL: 3rd, 15th, 4th, first

WORK_OF_ART: the Accused Nos, State of Punjab, the Accused Nos

PRODUCT: No.1-State, Appellant No.2, SCC11816

QUANTITY: 4 SCC675:2003. SCC, 4 SCC675:2003. SCC, 4 SCC675:2003. SCC, 4 SCC675:2003. SCC, 6 SCC146:1999, 6 SCC146:1999, 4 SCC675:2003. SCC, 4 SCC675:2003. SCC, 4 SCC675:2003. SCC

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //